Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Judge orders action over photographs depicting US military abuse
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/05/department-of-defense-federal-order-detainees-photographsSome photographs, which document treatment of detainees after 9/11, are said to be more disturbing that the infamous images of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib uncovered in 2004.
Judge orders action over photographs depicting US military abuse
Oliver Laughland
Wednesday 4 February 2015
The US Department of Defense has been given a week to explain why it has not yet complied with a federal court order to list the individual exemptions for the disclosure of over 2,000 photographs depicting military abuse of detainees in Afghanistan and Iraq.
At a district court hearing in Manhattan on Wednesday, judge Alvin Hellerstein described the consequences of the governments decade long court battle to suppress the photographs, as a way to obtain a very substantial delay on disclosure.
I have a feeling where we are at this point to make up a phrase at a line in the sand, Hellerstein said, instructing counsel for the Defense Department to submit in writing how long it would take to comply with the ruling made in August 2014, or to appeal the order.
The American Civil Liberties Union has been fighting a transparency case against the Defense Department since 2004. Some photographs, which document treatment of detainees in detention facilities after the September 11 attacks, are said to be more disturbing that the infamous images of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib uncovered in 2004.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 942 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge orders action over photographs depicting US military abuse (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Feb 2015
OP
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)1. I have mixed feelings about this.
On the one hand, disclosure? Hell yeah.
On the other hand every new revelation, each worse than the last is met by a large segment of the public with indifference. "We're the good guys, and since there are pictures of us waterboarding/torturing/eating babies, then that must be what good guys do. Go USA! Eat more evildoer babies!"
It doesn't ratchet up outrage, it normalizes depravity.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)2. Free speech.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)3. Sure, but I can't get excited about it. n/t