African American
Related: About this forumIf This is a War, Then Black Lives Matter is Losing
That tells us that our conditions or real material conditions have not changed substantially for over ½ century over 60 years.
Indeed, in many ways, those conditions have worsened, such as the phenomenon of mass incarceration.
Why? Because the material conditions of millions of Black folk have changed due to de-industrialization, the resultant loss of the tax base, the corporatization of the public school systems, and the explosive expansion of the imprisonment industry the creation of what I call the White Rural Jobs Program prisons.
...
As the late historian Howard Zinn (1922 2010) has written in his book The Twentieth Century:
despite his lofty rhetoric, Clinton showed, in his eight years in office, that he, like other politicians, was more interested in electoral victory than in social change.
To get more votes, he decided he must move the party closer to the center. This meant doing just enough for Blacks, women, and working people to keep their support, while trying to win over white conservative voters with a program of toughness on crime, stern measures on welfare, and a strong military. (Zinn, 428)
The neoliberal Clinton regime ushered in a program of repression that included the scuttling of habeas corpus via the anti-terrorism and effective death penalty act; the closing of the courthouse doors to prisoners via the Prison Litigation Reform Act; and the notorious 1996 Crime Bill, which spent billions on new prisons, and added some 60 new death penalties to the books.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/16/if-this-is-a-war-then-black-lives-matter-is-losing/
Chitown Kev
(2,197 posts)not 1996...which is actually a pretty critical difference.
2) "the creation of what I call the White Rural Jobs Program prisons"-lol, since Sanders touts so much that he's from a rural and nearly all white state, does that explain his "yea" vote for the 1994 crime bill?
or does the fact that he was "more interested in electoral victory than in social change" explain it?
Oh, and please explain why Bernie Sanders endorsed the "neoliberal Clinton regime" for reelection in 1996.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)Oh, and in case you guys didn't notice over at CP, Bill Clinton hasn't been POTUS for almost 20 years.
Cha
(297,503 posts)Freaking counterpunch hates our First Black President Obama. is right.
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)"contributors" (if you want to call them that), are associates of Julian Assange. That tells me everything I need to know about them as a journalistic outlet, and why they're always begging for money.
Response to Cha (Reply #3)
1StrongBlackMan This message was self-deleted by its author.
ellenrr
(3,864 posts)apparently not on DU.
fine.
adios.
PS instead of assaulting the messenger or the poster--
does it ever occur to anyone to read the content and reply to that?
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)shits & giggles?
Cha
(297,503 posts)counterpunch fits right in.. they both raise money off of President Obama hate. And, for that alone I doubt their veracity.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I can't agree with his logic or his conclusion here ... He uses 150 years of history to conclude that the (less than) 2 year old BLM Movement is losing in it's efforts ... despite its introducing the murder of Black people into the mainstream of political discussion?
It seems he thinks/thought that the war would be over with a single, well placed shot.
randys1
(16,286 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)when these are my purported "allies": http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=700494
randys1
(16,286 posts)is amazing.
Yes, if you own a BMW then you arent really Black.
And you have no business being concerned about non economic issues while there are white people not as well off as you.
ding ding ding
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)that want me to apologize, or feel guilty, because I have attained a measure of affluence!
Ain't gonna happen!