Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

El Supremo

(20,365 posts)
Tue Apr 24, 2012, 04:03 PM Apr 2012

Should all of trumad's posts be hidden automatically?

Last edited Wed Apr 25, 2012, 12:23 PM - Edit history (1)

It would sure save the jury's time and trouble.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=105176&sub=trans


4 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
yes
1 (25%)
no
3 (75%)
This poll will be hidden real soon.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should all of trumad's posts be hidden automatically? (Original Post) El Supremo Apr 2012 OP
Nahhh. There'd be nothing for people to talk about anymore. ScreamingMeemie Apr 2012 #1
That's what I say! nt joeybee12 Apr 2012 #2
I voted yes trumad Apr 2012 #3
You're such a dumbass. bluedigger Apr 2012 #4
Good thing you didn't say the BAD "d"-word! trotsky Apr 2012 #5
Oh, no! the bad d-word . . . Jack Rabbit Apr 2012 #9
Absolutely not! H2O Man Apr 2012 #6
you poor poor guy... Onceuponalife Apr 2012 #8
Absolutely not!!! Onceuponalife Apr 2012 #7
I'm probably misunderstanding your post JonLP24 Apr 2012 #10
I'm absolutely misunderstanding your post. bluedigger Apr 2012 #11
No. bluedigger Apr 2012 #12

Onceuponalife

(2,614 posts)
7. Absolutely not!!!
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 02:28 AM
Apr 2012

The sports forum needs its caveman and trumad fits the bill perfectly!

And upton needs someone to keep his ego in check. MiM can't do all the work!

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
10. I'm probably misunderstanding your post
Sun Apr 29, 2012, 09:18 AM
Apr 2012

but I think the poster in your last sentence has an ego that dwarfs the first two you mention. Unless I'm reading it incorrectly, I haven't noticed (which doesn't mean it didn't happen) the big ego poster reply to the poster you claim needs his ego checked or seen much interaction except when the ego needs checked poster points out the big ego's hypocrisy.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Should all of trumad's po...