Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,204 posts)
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:24 PM Sep 2013

Browns still dealing; Tackle Joe Thomas feels, "no one on team is safe"

cleveland.com/ 9-22-13MINNEAPOLIS -- The Browns' wheeling and dealing apparently didn't end with the Trent Richardson trade.

The club is fielding offers for receivers Greg Little and Josh Gordon, and has already received one quality offer for Gordon, according to ESPN's Adam Schefter.

SNIP

Also, NFL Media's Mike Silver reports that Browns' six-time Pro Bowl left tackle Joe Thomas is not on the trading block. Several teams have called about Thomas, but have been turned away, according to Silver.

Thomas said Friday that he feels no one on the team is safe.

LINK: http://www.cleveland.com/browns/index.ssf/2013/09/cleveland_browns_fielding_offe.html#incart_river

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Browns still dealing; Tackle Joe Thomas feels, "no one on team is safe" (Original Post) Auggie Sep 2013 OP
The Miami Marlins of the NFL trumad Sep 2013 #1
From Forbes: Did Browns Trade Trent Richardson Because Of Haslam's Legal Problems? Auggie Sep 2013 #2
They better not trade Gordon JonLP24 Sep 2013 #3

Auggie

(31,204 posts)
2. From Forbes: Did Browns Trade Trent Richardson Because Of Haslam's Legal Problems?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 04:14 PM
Sep 2013

forbes.com

Richardson had played well given the how pathetic the Browns are and is among the few, if perhaps only, up and coming stars on the team. But he but commands a high wage. Richardson’s fully-guaranteed four-year deal is worth $20.5 million over the four years, with a $13.3 signing bonus (which has been paid). He also has no offset language, which means he’ll receive the whole $20.5 million even if he signs with another team before the four years are up. According to Rotoworld, Richardson was due $1.3 million this year, $2.3 million in 2014 and $3.2 million in 2015, and becomes a free agent in 2016.

Which begs the question: Was the trade the result of the legal mess majority owner Jimmy Haslam’s truck stop company, Pilot Flying J , is entangled in? Some estimates the law suits Pilot Flying J faces could be quite expensive, and despite Haslam vowing he will not lose control of the team, plans have already been put in place for his 82 year old father to run the Browns should his son not be able to as a result of his company’s legal problems. Earlier this summer Haslam sold his ownership of a minor league baseball team.

A year ago Haslam, who a the time was a minority investor in the Pittsburgh Steelers, paid $987 million to buy the Browns from Randy Lerner, and vowed to be a hands-on owner. Perhaps too hands on?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2013/09/18/did-browns-trade-trent-richardson-because-of-haslams-legal-problems-at-pilot-flying-j/

Yeah, Haslam just may be the Jeff Loria of the NFL. Maybe worse.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
3. They better not trade Gordon
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 10:55 AM
Sep 2013

He is a terrific player and one of the best receivers in the league. They probably don't win that Minnesota game without him.

The Browns aren't serious about competing either now or down the league if they trade him.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Browns still dealing; Tac...