Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 06:13 PM Jan 2012

Rosewall’s Feat at 1972 Australian Open Is Aging Well

Ken Rosewall, the reigning champion at 37, had just won his fourth Australian Open, but he felt a little guilty.

“It’s not good for tennis generally for me to still be winning,” he told The Age, a Melbourne newspaper, after beating Mal Anderson, who was 36.

Anderson had worked as a tennis and squash instructor for four years, coming out of retirement only weeks before that 1972 tournament. Asked how two fathers (Anderson had three children, Rosewall two) had made it to a major final, Anderson said: “The youngsters these days have things too easily. There is too much money around, and they don’t have to fight for a living.”

Rosewall’s first-place check was for $2,240; Anderson took home $1,120. Forty years later, Rosewall remains the oldest man to win a Grand Slam tournament in the Open era, but the Australian Open has become much more lucrative. This year’s men’s and women’s champions will receive a record $2.3 million, or about $1 million more than Rosewall estimated he made in his 25-year career.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/17/sports/tennis/ken-rosewalls-1972-australian-open-victory-is-still-one-for-the-aged.html?_r=1&hpw

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rosewall’s Feat at 1972 Australian Open Is Aging Well (Original Post) joeybee12 Jan 2012 OP
Yeah, I can't see a 37-year-old winning a Slam nowadays. marmar Jan 2012 #1
Maybe up to 33... joeybee12 Jan 2012 #2
different game back then as well...... dhill926 Jan 2012 #3
MUCH less money...nt joeybee12 Jan 2012 #4

marmar

(77,084 posts)
1. Yeah, I can't see a 37-year-old winning a Slam nowadays.
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 06:53 PM
Jan 2012

I can see a Swiss guy who'll turn 31 this year winning another, though.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
2. Maybe up to 33...
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 06:56 PM
Jan 2012

37, no way.

What gets me is he beat a 36-year--old guy to win it!

Doesn't mention he made the finals of Wimbldeon at 40.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Rosewall’s Feat at 1972 A...