Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 10:49 AM Dec 2013

Judge: Church Must Give Names Of All Accused Priests

http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2013/12/02/hearing-to-focus-on-list-of-accused-priests/

A Ramsey County Judge has ordered the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis to reveal the names of 33 members of the clergy who allegedly abused children.

Monday’s court order is a major victory for those challenging the Catholic Church to come clean on the scandal that has plagued the Archdiocese and haunted abuse survivors.

...

“The era of secrecy around the identities of those offenders is now drawing to and nearing an end,” attorney Jeff Anderson said.

...

Beyond the 33 names and ages, it will include when they were ordained, where they served and where they are now.


Fantastic that steps are being taken to help bring closure for victims, and perhaps prevent new ones. Pathetic that it took a court order to get this. Why has the RCC continued - to this day - to relocate and protect molesters?
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: Church Must Give Names Of All Accused Priests (Original Post) trotsky Dec 2013 OP
You should post the full statement. rug Dec 2013 #1
More info from Minnesota Public Radio: trotsky Dec 2013 #2
That is just to hard to believe... rexcat Dec 2013 #3
Their priorities are clear skepticscott Dec 2013 #4
Defend what? rug Dec 2013 #5
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
1. You should post the full statement.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 01:12 PM
Dec 2013

Never mind, I will.

Archdiocese Receives Approval of Court to Proceed with Disclosure

Date:
Monday, December 2, 2013
Source:
Jim Accurso


The Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis is grateful for the approval of Ramsey County court to release information relating to priests who have been credibly accused of sexual abuse of minors in our archdiocese. We anticipate releasing this information on Thursday, December 5 on a new page of our web site and in our archdiocesan newspaper, The Catholic Spirit.

Included in this disclosure will be the following information: the cleric’s name; year of birth; age; year of ordination; year of death (if deceased); prior assignments; current status (permanently removed from ministry, laicized, deceased, etc.); city and state where they presently reside. The information to be released is mostly related to reported incidents that occurred between the mid- 1950’s and 1980’s. Most of the men whose names will be released have been previously identified in media reports. All of these men who will be identified have been permanently removed from ministry or are deceased.

These disclosures are not intended to be final. A comprehensive review of clergy files is ongoing presently and the list will be updated regularly as additional announcements are made in the future. This new level of disclosure is part of a comprehensive and cohesive set of actions we have been taking this fall to address the issues associated with clergy sexual misconduct in our archdiocese. These disclosure practices may evolve in the future as we progress with our disclosure, including recommendations that may be made by the independent task force or through the review of our clergy files by an outside firm.

Our goals are to protect the young and vulnerable, care for victims of abuse, and restore trust among the laity, as well as our clergy who are serving honorably. Those who have been victimized by these horrible crimes have been deeply hurt. It is our hope that disclosure of these names can assist victims in their healing process. Any sexual abuse of minors by clergy members cannot and will not be tolerated. As we have previously stated, anyone having knowledge of clergy sexual misconduct should immediately call law enforcement and is encouraged to notify the archdiocese.

http://www.archspm.org/news-events/news-detail.php?intResourceID=10964


Since many of there personnel files concerns individuals accused, but not convicted, the necessity of a court order is crucial.

Sorry to bust your bubble but this story is about a legal maneuver.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
2. More info from Minnesota Public Radio:
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 02:15 PM
Dec 2013
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2013/12/02/judge-releases-list-of-46-priests-accused-of-sexual-abuse

Archdiocesan officials have fought in the past to keep the list secret, but changed their position in response to an MPR News investigation that found that church leaders protected a priest who admitted to sexually abusing boys on an American Indian reservation and did not disclose his abuse to the police or the public. Archbishop John Nienstedt announced on Nov. 11 that he would begin releasing the names of priests with substantiated allegations of child sexual abuse against them in November if he obtained a judge's permission.

...

The battle over the list began in 2004, when the archdiocese told researchers at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice that it knew of 33 priests accused of sexually abusing children. The archdiocese did not provide the names of the priests. Researchers used the information from the archdiocese and other dioceses around the country to study the prevalence of clergy sexual abuse.

In 2009, victims' attorneys Jeff Anderson and Mike Finnegan asked a judge to order that the names of the 33 priests be released. Ramsey County Judge Gregg Johnson ordered the archdiocese to provide the information to the attorneys as part of a specific lawsuit but immediately placed the list under seal. It has remained under seal since then, which means it could not be released to the public -- and victims' attorneys cannot reveal its contents -- without a judge's order to unseal it.


It is beyond pathetic that the RCC was ordered to compile and now release this information, yet their PR machine is trying to spin it as being "allowed" by the judge to finally reveal it... despite sitting on it (and protecting men they KNEW were abusers) for decades prior.

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
3. That is just to hard to believe...
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 04:33 PM
Dec 2013

I can't imagine that the catholic church would not be open about the sexual abuse that it perpetrated!



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Judge: Church Must Give N...