Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumSupreme Court blocks contraceptives rule for religious groups
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-supreme-court-obamacare-contraceptive-religion-20140124,0,3103098.story#axzz2rQ5wPtVwNuns attend an antiabortion service marking the 41st anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, hosted by the Little Sisters of the Poor in Scranton, Pa. (Butch Comegys / Scranton Times-Tribune / January 21, 2014)
By David G. Savage
January 24, 2014, 2:53 p.m.
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Friday shielded the Little Sisters of the Poor and other nonprofit religious groups from complying, for now, with the Obama administrations rule that they provide free contraceptives in the health insurance they offer employees.
The justices issued a one-paragraph order that keeps in place a temporary injunction that was handed down by Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Dec. 31.
The Little Sisters of the Poor and other Catholic charities objected to the so-called contraceptive mandate -- a provision of the Affordable Care Act -- on religious grounds. Their lawyers said they feared draconian fines if they failed to comply with the new rule, which took effect Jan. 1.
Fridays order says that if Little Sisters and the other nonprofits that filed suit inform the Secretary of Health and Human Services in writing that they have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services, the government may not enforce the provision until the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver rules on their legal challenge.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 760 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court blocks contraceptives rule for religious groups (Original Post)
cbayer
Jan 2014
OP
Historic NY
(37,453 posts)1. they might want to reconsider....
Pregnant Nun, Roxana Rodriguez, Gives Birth: 31-Year-Old Says She Didn't Know She Was Carrying Baby
http://www.ibtimes.com/pregnant-nun-roxana-rodriguez-gives-birth-31-year-old-says-she-didnt-know-she-was-carrying-baby
cbayer
(146,218 posts)2. 9 pounds?
And she is saying she never had sex?
Oh dear.
safeinOhio
(32,727 posts)3. Either a miracle or
too much wine.
Igel
(35,359 posts)4. Or she became a novice after she was pregnant.
Other possibilities, too. But that's the winner without asserting that she broke her vows.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)5. Good thought. That is very possible.
Poor thing.