Religion
Related: About this forumAtheist Whose Article About Discrimination was Banned from School Newspaper Gets $1,000 Award
Good for her...
Today, the Knoxville News Sentinel (the paper that broke the story in the first place) published the article that the school banned. The editors are thereby giving it more exposure than her high-school paper wouldve offered and that benefits everybody. Thanks, Streisand Effect!
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2012/02/26/student-whose-article-about-atheist-discrimination-was-banned-from-school-newspaper-gets-1000-award-from-ffrf/
handmade34
(22,756 posts)Krystal is onto something...
RKP5637
(67,109 posts)Kurmudgeon
(1,751 posts)2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)pokerfan
(27,677 posts)Please continue.
saras
(6,670 posts)I suppose you'd have to believe irrationally in the absence of God, even though no science works without God, and atheists, like everyone else, depend on God for the sun to rise, for enzymes to catalyze their appropriate reactions, and, of course, to roll the quantum dice for every elementary particle in the universe. I mean, who else could do it? Could YOU do it?
I REALLY hope the is redundant.
I wouldn't go so far as to call the article boring, but it's close. Factual, newsy, and really quiet in its opinions. I'm not surprised it gets generally civil reactions. As a writer, she's definitely a student of government.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Ohio Dem
(4,357 posts)And not collecting coins is a hobby.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I know it really burns you up to know that your religion is never going to be enshrined into law, that fewer and fewer people are believing the nonsense your religion offers, and that reason and critical thought are winning the day.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)Let's use Christianity as an example.
Dogma - check
Prescribed text - check
Liturgy - check
Atheism
Dogma - "there is no God"
Prescribed text - none
Liturgy - none
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)If someone is compensated for being discriminated over being black, or female, or gay, or a Democrat, does that make being black or female, or gay, or a Democrat a religion?
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)It's simply something that you desperately need to convince yourself or others of, and so you cling like a life preserver to anything that seems to validate it, regardless of its intellectual support.
mr blur
(7,753 posts)Imagine that.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)MarkCharles
(2,261 posts)get the true believers all upset.
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)laconicsax
(14,860 posts)MarkCharles is no longer with us.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=277127&sub=trans
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)He should have called defenders of women rights "pro-deathers." That'd grant him immunity.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Alternatively, he could have called an accused murderer an "evil c*nt" and still won the immunity idol.
EvilAL
(1,437 posts)Too bad. He made some good points in his short time here. Ruffled a few of the wrong feathers and then got out of hand it seems.. Oh well. I've seem people tombstoned for less than that..
Response to laconicsax (Reply #13)
Post removed
cbayer
(146,218 posts)and unfair.
I had no personal beef with this member and the decision to ban him was a group decision by the MIRT.
You have no idea what went on regarding the decision and the final action, and your making this a personal attack against me is really out of line.
Continue to pontificate on things about which you know virtually nothing and engage in petty snarkfests that completely lack content. I don't really care. But to impugn my character and judgement in this case is just uncalled for.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)You want to avoid me? Ignore is your solution. I will continue to pontificate on whatever I choose, and I could care less how you feel about it.
You pick and choose what you want to see and respond to, seemingly ignoring what I actually said, instead feigning outrage at some perceived personal attack. I feel that in light of the recent events in Religion, it was inappropriate for YOU to be the one to write his eulogy. THAT'S what I said. THAT is not a personal attack. THAT is my opinion.
Lets look at YOUR words.
And you claim you had no personal beef with this member?
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)He did some things that were WAY over the line. They went beyond dickish into threats and stalking and harassment. Just because he was an atheist doesn't make him beyond reproach. He fucked up in a big way, multiple times, to multiple people, and he paid the ultimate price, his DU life.
Whatever cbayer's faults, she did the right thing here, and it sounds like it was done after some good discussion by the MIR team. I wasn't privy to those conversations, but I know they were had because of MIR team members who posted in the hosts forum, which I am privy to. Reading through the post in the hosts forum, it became pretty obvious that MC had caused problems in several groups and forums for several different hosts.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)It was a tough decision all the way around and the team worked very hard on it. We had a time limit to make a final decision (that's how the system works) and I would have preferred not to have been the one to pull the trigger because I knew there were some who would use it as a tool to personally attack me. But when it came down to the wire, I did it because he was continuing to relentlessly attack one of the hosts.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)that it was a MIRT decision. That might have helped make it look like it wasn't just you.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)MIRT works by consensus, particularly in difficult situations such as this, and a statement to that effect may have helped.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)What I took exception to was the fact that out of ALL of the Hosts, cbayer was the one to PPR him, and the words she used in the explanation on his transparency page reek of personal payback.
EvolveOrConvolve
(6,452 posts)I know that there's been personal animosity between the two, but this was definitely the right decision. If I thought otherwise, I'd be right there with you.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)She tried to make it obvious why he was ppr'd, not as a personal payback but for behavior that deserved ppr'ing. Admin agreed with us.
deacon_sephiroth
(731 posts)Percentage of posts hidden: 0.59%
and he's classified as a malicious intruder...
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)I can't link to the relevant thread because it's in the Host forum, but here's what happened.
He posted a press release from a questionable source in LBN. When his thread was locked, he started PMing the locking host legitimately threatening messages and accusing her of being a racist homophobe for locking his thread. When the host blocked him from sending her PMs, he started trolling active threads to continue his tirade. This wasn't the first time he had gone on the same 'everyone who disagrees with me or does something I don't like is a racist homophobe' tirade, hence the malicious intruder label.
deacon_sephiroth
(731 posts)He had some pretty good ones.
Then again there was that time that he advocated the totalitarian banning of all religions under pain of law or death or something... I remember all the sane folks had to talk him out of his compound and ask him to put the gun down that day. Still, it's sad to see him go.