Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:09 PM Feb 2012

Soraya Chemaly: "I'm No Longer a Catholic. Why Are You?"

At its core, this debate is about control. And not just birth control. Either you are willing to support and participate in a culture in which men, refusing to accept women as fully human, use a perverted claim of divine right to control women and their bodies, or you don't. For me, equality -- for everyone -- and the way I want my children to understand their place in the world outweighed my commitment to a faith, which, no matter how much real good it does in the world, does more harm by its failure to recognize the fundamental humanity of its female adherents. This isn't about freedom of religion; it's about freedom from religion.


....

But seriously, how obviously violent do things have to get before we learn the lesson that powerful, all-male environments with perverted notions of sex, sexuality and gender have damaging and corrosive effects on the whole society? I have no doubt that the same could be true if the genders were reversed, but that's not the world we live in.

For me, it's simple. Why on earth would I continue to pay any attention to men -- and they are all men, even when they have conservative lay women fighting their battles -- who expect me to not only believe wrong, perverted, ideas about me, my gender and sexuality, but also ask me to transmit that information to my children? To stick with the pre-modern theme at hand, I'd sooner flay myself.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/soraya-chemaly/catholic-leadership-does-not-represent-women_b_1276929.html?ref=fb&src=sp&comm_ref=false#sb=641797,b=facebook
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
1. She answers her own question in the article.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:17 PM
Feb 2012

"But, the ability to walk away is a real and tangible privilege. I could seek spiritual and material options. I had an understanding-if-startled family, was educated, could support myself, was healthy, had no children. I was reliant on the church for nothing. That is not the case for many, including non-Catholics, who are closely tied to the church through culture, conscience, faith, marriage, need or employment."

 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
2. So, you are affirming the insidious nature of religion to
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:24 PM
Feb 2012

relegate those who are less educated, less affluent, and had children to a virtual mental prison?

Just wondering.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
3. Er, no. I am acknowledging that there are many reasons people may choose
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:37 PM
Feb 2012

to stay with or leave a specific institution.

And that some people have more privilege and that gives them greater latitude.

Just as the author does.

 

MarkCharles

(2,261 posts)
6. So you think the less educated, less affluent, .....
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:55 PM
Feb 2012

and parents of many children have just as much free will and opportunity to make a "choice" when held under a contrived threat of punishment for not obeying and adhering to what they were taught? This is more true for women than for men, as the author also points out, because the religion teaches the women that they are less powerful than men. Yet you feel that such a "choice" is their own to freely make?

What part of that assures people that they all have free will, that they all are equally capable of making such "choices"?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
7. When a question contains a declarative statement, it's not really a question.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:59 PM
Feb 2012

Thanks for posting this. It's an interesting and well thought out article.

SharonAnn

(13,779 posts)
5. Thanks, I just forwarded this to some of fallen-away Catholic women friends.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:52 PM
Feb 2012

I received an email from my alma mater today (a Jesuit university) with all kinds of claptrap about the bill and how we should oppose it. Here's the letter I wrote back to them:

"As an alumni of both _______ University and ______ University, I am disappointed that the Catholic Church still does not recognize women’s right to decide about their own bodies. Therefore, I still cannot contribute in any way to either institution or any arm of the Catholic Church.

It is inappropriate for male bachelors to tell women what to do. Since they have no life with women or children, in the sense of working on a marriage or raising a family, they should just keep quiet and let women decide what they need to do for themselves and their families. It is between women, their families, and their God. It is no one else’s business!

This situation, along with the Catholic Church’s refusal to allow women to fully participate in leadership positions, means that I still will not be able to participate in the Church. It is very disappointing to me that the Church is still stuck in ancient practices.

I am sorry about that, but I have tried too many times to reconcile with the Church and have found that I simply cannot support a Church that denies women full expression of their God-given talents and that denies them the right to make choices over their reproductive life.

Please don’t ever again contact me on these issues. "

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Soraya Chemaly: "I'm...