Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 09:12 AM Apr 2014

Freedom From Religion as a Civil Right

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nigel-barber/freedom-from-religion_b_5153271.html

Nigel Barber
Biopsychologist; blogger, Psychology Today's 'The Human Beast'

Posted: 04/15/2014 12:59 pm EDT Updated: 04/15/2014 12:59 pm EDT


Bloomberg via Getty Images

The separation of church and state in the U.S. constitution is more honored in the breach than in the observance. Those who want to escape from organized religion must fight for that freedom against those in power who would foist religious views upon them at every turn. The religious pledge of allegiance continues to be recited in schools despite being clearly unconstitutional.

Religious oppression is far worse in other countries than it is in the U.S. It is not like living in an Islamic republic where rejecting Islam (or apostasy) is punishable by death. Still, that is a very low bar. Countries that lack religious freedom have a very bad quality of life in other respects, as I pointed out in my book Why Atheism Will Replace Religion.

It is not unreasonable to expect that the home of modern democracy would grant its citizens the same freedom to reject religion as residents of other developed democracies do, especially when that right is written into the constitution in the sense that no religion may be established by the state.

Yet, the establishment of the Christian religion is apparent everywhere. I would like to know why my taxes are used to pay a Christian chaplain who is hired by Congress to lead them in prayer. Why does the U.S. Army and the National Guard use my tax money to pay chaplains who lead the troops in prayer?

more at link
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

SevenSixtyTwo

(255 posts)
3. This is why it's important
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 09:28 AM
Apr 2014

To not go chipping away at or attempting to reinterpret the parts of the Constitution we don't agree with. It sets the precedence for others to chip away at the parts we do agree with. Cherish the Constitution in it's entirety, protect it and live by it.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
6. I think we really lost some ground in terms of separation issues over
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 09:35 AM
Apr 2014

the past 30 years and it's time to shore up those levies.

brewens

(13,588 posts)
4. I recently had a woman at work as part of a pre-blood drive meeting also lead a prayer.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 09:29 AM
Apr 2014

I did not object or walk off as I could have. It really caught me by surprise. The same woman complained to a supervisor once about I and another guy uttering fairly rare spontanious expletives. She claimed that makes her uncomfortable. In those case, sometimes it just happens. You smash a finger or drop something and out it comes!

All of the rest of the crew that day of the prayer are religious. One Morman and the rest some other Christian of whatever type. This woman in charge had just found out he nephews cancer is terminal and that had something to do with her wantng to pray. If it happens again, I'll have a little private chat with her and put a stop to it. I'll just tell her it's a waste of my time and I have better things to do. It's really such a slam dunk if I go to our bosses with it that she'll have to knock it off.

It will be interesting what happens and how the rest of the crew will react. It will probably be the usual outrage that their religious freedom is being infringed.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
5. Very ironic.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 09:35 AM
Apr 2014

Seems like a situation where some education can go a long way.

If she objects to expletives that she feels are offensive to the religious, then she should be able to understand why you would object to a prayer.

And when it comes down to it, your complaint has more legal standing than hers.

I hope you are able to resolve it with her in a way that benefits everyone involved, though I realize that may not happen.

brewens

(13,588 posts)
8. It will be interesting because I won't be interfering in their ability to pray if they
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 09:53 AM
Apr 2014

feel they need to. I just feel I'm not being paid to take part in and superstitious chants or rituals. I won't put it that way, that would ensure some poutrage on their part. There is one woman on the crew I have a little score to settle with though. She lied about me awhile back. I'd love to trap her into trying to retaliate against me over the prayer thing. That would go to HR immediately!

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
10. I'm sorry that this will likely become a battleground
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 10:02 AM
Apr 2014

instead of an opportunity to agree to some mutually respectful lines.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
7. I just don't understand.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 09:39 AM
Apr 2014

The issues he raises - the congressional chaplain, swearing in on bibles, "In God We Trust" on money, discrimination against atheists - all have been brought up by individuals here in this very group, only to be shot down and told to hush, there are more important battles to fight. Is it any wonder some atheists here might be angry about the double standard exhibited by some?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
9. If you were factual and not polemic, you'd realize those topics were brought up as OPs by believers.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 10:01 AM
Apr 2014

Gothmog

(145,265 posts)
11. As a member of a minority religion, this is a good idea
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 01:19 PM
Apr 2014

People need to have the freedom to reject religion as well as to practice their religion. Members of minority religions and non-believers are really in the same boat in that neither want to be forced to practice the religion of the majority.

 

Leontius

(2,270 posts)
12. When the state uses force to make you practice the religion of the majority
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 04:01 PM
Apr 2014

you will find quite a few of that majority standing with you to resist it.

Prophet 451

(9,796 posts)
14. You think?
Thu Apr 17, 2014, 12:54 AM
Apr 2014

I'd be a lot less certain of that. Firstly because humans are instinctively conformist (proved many times but Ashe was the original); secondly, because humans will generally obey a perceived authority figure (Milgram) and thirdly, because, in my experience, most people are just fine with oppression as long as the boot is at teh neck of someone else.

Jim__

(14,076 posts)
13. I wish Barber would have given answers to his own questions.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 07:34 PM
Apr 2014
I have some questions for the president, and the Supreme Court about the presumed separation of church and state.

...

  • How can the Governor of Alabama on his first day in office say that people who are not Christians are not his brothers or sisters? Why does my local TV weatherman in Alabama tell me that I will need an umbrella on my way to church?
    ...

  • Why are atheists discriminated against in hiring decisions and generally unable to hold political office in America?
    ...


My guess is that the local TV weatherman can say pretty much whatever he wants about needing an umbrella on the way to church - as long as the TV station and sponsors have no problem with it. Does Barber think his right to freedom from religion trumps the right of the TV weatherman to speak his mind?

As to the governor of Alabama, it depends on the context of his remarks, but, personally, I don't consider him my brother and don't really care whether or not he considers me his brother. And that same feeling extends to the governor of my state. I would protest if the governor said anything to the effect that only Christians had the full benefits of citizenship.

As to atheist being unable to hold political office, I doubt that's true. But, I would be extremely unlikely to vote for a fundamentalist Christian for a public office. Does Barber think it's somehow a constitutional violation for me to consider religion when I cast my vote?

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Freedom From Religion as ...