Religion
Related: About this forumFaith in Values: Political Pluralism: How Government Can Support Conflicting Religious Beliefs
By Sally Steenland | April 16, 2014
When World Vision USA announced three weeks ago that it would begin hiring Christians in same-sex marriages, the conservative reaction was strong and swift. Individual donors jammed the call centers phone lines, and within two days, 10,000 poor children had lost their sponsors. The right-wing Family Research Council blasted the organizations decision, as did evangelist Franklin Graham, Russell Moore of the Southern Baptist Convention, and others.
Just 48 hours after the announcement, World Vision reversed its decision. Its president, Richard Stearns, acknowledged the uproar the new policy had caused and asked forgiveness for the mistake. Over the next several days, criticism of World Visions reversal began sprouting. The online advocacy group Faithful America organized a petition calling for the two Google executives on World Visions board of directors to resign. After 17,000 signatures and a spate of publicity, one of them did.
And then a professor at Whitworth University, a Presbyterian school in Spokane, Washington, located near World Visions headquarters, wrote a public letter decrying its change of heart. We rejoiced in the initial announcement and we grieve the reversal, the letter says. It continues:
Christians have worked together across their differences on a wide variety of issues, and they should continue to do so when a mission transcending narrow doctrinal matters is at stake. we call on Christian institutions to employ LGBT brothers and sisters in Christ who help further the mission of their institutions.
Julia Stronks is the professor who wrote the letter. She was thrilled when World Vision made its initial decision. Here was a faith-based institution showing leadership on how to treat gay people with justice, she said in an interview for this column. I was brokenhearted when they reversed their decision. Stronks wrote down her reflections, shared them with some friends who sent her words to their friendsand thus the public letter was born, gathering more than 350 signatures in less than a week.
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion/news/2014/04/16/88106/political-pluralism-how-government-can-support-conflicting-religious-beliefs/
pinto
(106,886 posts)I don't think religion should have any role in politics. And politics shouldn't have any role in religion. What one individual believes may flavor their personal political involvement - understood. And vice versa, on a personal level.
Yet organizational involvement either way needs to be limited in strict constitutional terms. It's gone too far. Especially in the money that flows from one to the other. And the political legislation proposed or enacted in a religious format.
I think the country needs a break. May be throwing the baby out with the bath water in some aspects but I feel it would be best all around.
Separate. And see where it all settles.
rug
(82,333 posts)Its government must find a resolution that is simultaneously hands-off and even-handed.