Religion
Related: About this forumIs atheism without works dead? The shifting landscape of nontheistic service
Members of the Humanist Community at Harvard at a city cleanup in 2013. Photo courtesy of HCH.
Chris Stedman | Apr 17, 2014
When it comes to neighborliness, atheist Americans have some catching up to dobut efforts are underway to change that.
This change is vital because, with greater resources, religious Americans are currently doing more to help others than the nonreligious.
In American Grace Robert Putnam and David Campbell discuss the fact that, overall, religious Americans are more civically engaged than the nonreligiousthey volunteer more often and give more money to both religious and secular charities. They are, per Putnam and Campbell, better neighbors.
But Putnam and Campbell also found that nonbelieving spouses of believers are just as civically engaged if involved in their partners religious community. So the connection between religion and civic engagement seems to have less to do with belief and more to do with belonging. Communities connect people and inspire them to do more to help others.
http://chrisstedman.religionnews.com/2014/04/17/atheism-without-works-dead-nontheism-service-humanity/
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)there is a reason for that- a large number of Americans think we shouldn't even be considered citizens at best, or hate us at worst.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Where do I line up for my cross tattoo and 'Jesus Loves Me' T-shirt? ... I can't wait ...
Oh, and the fact that atheists have been hunted down like animals for centuries might have had an effect on the development of humanist institutions of any great size when compared to the favored theologies that have held power over the millennia ...
But, it should be obvious why atheists are so greedy and mean - they don't have JESUS to make them nice and all lovey dovey towards humanity ...
Yep ....
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)"In American Grace Robert Putnam and David Campbell discuss the fact that, overall, religious Americans are more civically engaged than the nonreligious"
Where the fuck is this charity study and what journal was it published in?
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Page 235 asks the relevant question, but does NOT tabulate the data in such a way as to discern between giving BY non-religious people and religious people.
It does, on the next page, tabulate giving to non-religious charities versus religious charities, and they compare favorably to the non-religious in all but the $5,000+ category.
In fact, one could look at the 'none' category and assume that religious people are thus stingy giving to non-religious charities, but boy that would be a massive assumption with no real evidence and alternative possible causes.
I'm not seeing where this survey actually shows what the 'two discussed' in the book that references it.
You can get the survey here; http://www.ropercenter.uconn.edu/CFIDE/roper/collectioninterest/webroot/registration.cfm?subject=FM
rug
(82,333 posts)BTW, the article is primarily about volunteer activities, not financial donations. He's not saying nonbelievers are parsimonious. He is saying there are fewer outlets for nonreligious service.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It took me a while to find the giving $'s question in the survey, so I thought I would provide the page numbers, and help you jump to it.
Whether the person giving was religious or non-religious wasn't asked. The religious/nonreligious nature of the target of their giving was asked, and the non-religious charities actually favorably compared, up to the $5k donation rate, where the nonreligious charities received far fewer donations at that level.
Overall, it's fairly tight between the two groups.
rug
(82,333 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)as long as the data is formatted in the expected manner, you can feed that registration total garbage and get the file without verifying your e-mail address.
Normally I wouldn't do that, but I just wanted to see one thing for non-commercial purposes to verify a claim. If that doesn't fall under fair use, mea culpa.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)working for the public good.
No one should feel that they have to participate, but the more that do, the better.
Extra added bonus - it provides an opportunity to atheist groups to participate in interfaith activities, something that will likely be a big positive over time.