Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Tue May 6, 2014, 10:41 AM May 2014

A Defeat for Religious Neutrality - NYT Editorial

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/06/opinion/a-defeat-for-religious-neutrality.html?_r=0

By THE EDITORIAL BOARDMAY 5, 2014

The American values of pluralism and inclusion are central to the First Amendment, which forbids government from favoring or aligning itself with any particular religion or believers over nonbelievers.

In a lamentable ruling on Monday, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority brushed past those core values to allow the town of Greece, in upstate New York, to begin its town hall meetings with a sectarian prayer nearly always from a Christian “chaplain of the month.”

Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the majority, relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Marsh v. Chambers, a 1983 case in which the court upheld the Nebraska Legislature’s practice of opening its sessions with a chaplain’s prayer, saying that such invocations were “deeply embedded in the history and tradition of this country.”

Yet, as Justice Elena Kagan emphasized in a persuasive dissent, determining whether a particular prayer program violates the First Amendment is a fact-specific exercise, and there are important distinctions between the practice in the Nebraska case and the practice in the New York town. Justice Kagan said a town-hall meeting “need not become a religion-free zone,” and that “legislative prayer has a distinctive constitutional warrant by virtue of tradition,” dating back to the first session of Congress. But she said the practice in the town of Greece does not fit that tradition, for starters, because, unlike the Nebraska case, which involved an audience of elected legislators, the town hall meetings involved ordinary citizens, some there to petition their local government for permits, zoning variances and other individualized matters.

More at link
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Defeat for Religious Neutrality - NYT Editorial (Original Post) cbayer May 2014 OP
There is an excellent discussion of this happening on "Forum" (NPR) cbayer May 2014 #1
Glad to see NYT Editorial Board address this. Pretty blatant. pinto May 2014 #2
Meh. trotsky May 2014 #3

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
1. There is an excellent discussion of this happening on "Forum" (NPR)
Tue May 6, 2014, 01:00 PM
May 2014

this morning.

There is a lot of discussion about how this pertains to many issues around religion in the US and how this effects non-believers, including humanists, atheists, agnostics, spiritual/not religious, etc.

Recommended if you are interested in this topic.

pinto

(106,886 posts)
2. Glad to see NYT Editorial Board address this. Pretty blatant.
Tue May 6, 2014, 01:14 PM
May 2014

Allowing this leaves the barn door open, so to speak. Thanks for the post.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
3. Meh.
Tue May 6, 2014, 01:19 PM
May 2014

The same terminology and arguments have been used right here on DU.

I remember back to President Obama's inauguration, when threads appeared that were critical of the excessive religiosity. They were shouted down with cries of "Tradition!" and "Don't you atheists have something better to do?" and "Let's save our efforts for the REAL violations of church-state separation!"

Oh some tried to point out that the little things enable the big things, that if you don't at least talk about and make an effort on the little things, it will be harder to fight the big things.

They were shouted down, of course. So it seems kind of odd that now there is concern about this.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»A Defeat for Religious Ne...