Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 02:59 PM Mar 2012

A good, godless life

Alom Shaha wants to give atheism some much-needed humanity.

Andrew Stephens
March 10, 2012

WHEN the so-called New Atheists started to heap particularly virulent scorn on the world's believers a few years ago, Alom Shaha - a London-based Bangladeshi-born former Muslim - was unimpressed. An atheist since adolescence, he had been contemplating a far gentler approach: the nature of love. Living a good life, he thought, simply could not be the sole province of those with faith in a supernatural deity.

Shaha found no evidence atheists commit more crime, violence or acts of ''evil'' than religious people, musings that have informed The Young Atheist's Handbook, his moving memoir of enlightenment. In it he relates his journey towards atheism after the death of his mother when he was 13, and his discovery of how love provides meaning in the world - regardless of a god.

The problem for Shaha, though, was not how to confront the dogma of god-botherers, but how to avoid aligning himself with that outspoken coterie of fervent atheists who delightedly mock religions.

Shaha is among a new breed of non-believers far more congenial than Richard Dawkins (The God Delusion) or Christopher Hitchens (God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything), among others. Rather than being combative, Shaha et al look for what religions might have to offer us. As philosopher Alain de Botton says, the wisdom and richness of world religions - their art, culture, sense of community, architecture and far-reaching organisational skills - are to be valued for what they tell us about living a good life, and the ways they illuminate our experiences and deep inner selves.

http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/books/a-good-godless-life-20120309-1up7l.html

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A good, godless life (Original Post) rug Mar 2012 OP
oh thank god for the good atheists! Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #1
"As philosopher Alain de Botton says..." Rob H. Mar 2012 #2
Why DonCoquixote Mar 2012 #6
No, not because he's different from Dawkins Rob H. Mar 2012 #7
Nice. Sounds like someone it would be great to have a meal, a glass of wine and cbayer Mar 2012 #3
Alom Shaha: longship Mar 2012 #4
As long as you include "materialists" as theists... saras Mar 2012 #5
Complete and Utter rubbish longship Mar 2012 #8
What did Pshaw do? Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #10
Pshaw longship Mar 2012 #11
What he proposes doesn't seem far from what mainstream Protestantism has done FarCenter Mar 2012 #9

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
6. Why
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 04:54 PM
Mar 2012

Because this person differs from Dawkins? If you do not want Atheism to have the same limits as religion, do not treat dawkins and Hitchens like they were Popes; they are not the only ones who get to define what atheism is.

Rob H.

(5,352 posts)
7. No, not because he's different from Dawkins
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 05:04 PM
Mar 2012

Because de Botton is a self-promoting accommodationist nitwit who thinks that in order for nonbelievers to gain more acceptance from believers they should embrace the trappings of religion. (See his idea about constructing a temple dedicated to atheism.) I think he's barking up the wrong tree.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
3. Nice. Sounds like someone it would be great to have a meal, a glass of wine and
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 03:18 PM
Mar 2012

a long conversation with.

Actually, sounds a lot like my better half.

longship

(40,416 posts)
4. Alom Shaha:
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 03:56 PM
Mar 2012

Many theists heap virulent scorn on all non-believers.

Like the fundamentalists in Africa who murder girls for witchcraft. The gangs of noodleheads in Baghdad who murdered young people because they didn't like the way they dressed. The Taliban who blew up the beautiful Bayiman Buddhas, and put women to death for getting raped. The kooks in the USA who claim that this is a Christian country only because that's precisely what they want it to be. I shudder what this country would become if they actually had their way.

So, kind person, I reserve my love for those who are deserving of something beyond my utter revulsion and condemnation.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
5. As long as you include "materialists" as theists...
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 04:47 PM
Mar 2012

Personally I consider Stalin's, Hitler's, Mao's, and Pol Pot's killings, among others to be "religious" in nature. Whatever that "true belief' thing is that causes mass slaughter, it DOES NOT REQUIRE A GOD. What it requires is an authoritarian hierarchy, and they work just as well with a human, a deity, or an abstraction on top.

longship

(40,416 posts)
8. Complete and Utter rubbish
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 05:45 PM
Mar 2012

I'm calling Godwin's law on you.

Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot. Pshaw!

I'm done here.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
9. What he proposes doesn't seem far from what mainstream Protestantism has done
Sat Mar 10, 2012, 06:50 PM
Mar 2012

The focus is primarily on moral, ethical, and cultural values. Admittedly, it does continue to profess a belief in God and an afterlife, but not at all militantly. Many in the pews probably don't believe the stricter points of dogma, and the theologians are very unlikely to. Many would not believe in God as officially defined, nor would they believe in Heaven and Hell and Judgement as officially defined.

A lot of nominal Catholics take a similar view.

Most religious people are far more sensible about religion that the more fundamentalist types.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»A good, godless life