Religion
Related: About this forumOpinion analysis: Does the new religious exemption go far enough? (UPDATED)
Lyle Denniston Reporter
Posted Mon, June 30th, 2014 2:00 pm
UPDATE 2:14 p.m. Acting swiftly in the wake of the Courts ruling on Monday, and relying directly upon that decision, the Eleventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday blocked all enforcement of the mandate against an Alabama Catholic TV network, a non-profit entity. The concurring opinion of the Court of Appeals, written by Circuit Judge William H. Pryor, Jr., argued that the accommodation, discussed in the following post, is itself likely to be struck down.
Analysis
Female employees of companies whose owners religious beliefs forbid them to provide access to birth control may look forward to that coverage by other means but, again, maybe not. The answer depends upon how literally the Supreme Court, in future cases, reads the language it used on Monday to assure those workers that they will get that coverage, after all, under the new federal health care law.
Read as actually contained in two opinions in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, that language seems to decide an issue that actually was not before the Court but soon will be. Here is that question: does the accommodation of business owners religious views need an added accommodation to make it acceptable to them, and to make the birth control mandate legal?
Understanding the scope of the Courts ruling depends upon both the lead opinion by Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., which has the full support of four other Justices and that makes it binding, and upon the separate opinion of Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who, while one of the five in the majority, wrote separately in an attempt to show how narrow the Courts decision was.
http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/06/opinion-analysis-does-the-new-religious-exemption-go-far-enough/
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Far enough to piss everyone off and get Single Payer passed.
I hope anyway.
pinto
(106,886 posts)That's some sort of government infringement on a business owner's religious views? What a ball of wax.
I agree with Justice Ginsburg's pointed dissent. There's a whole raft of unintended, or intended, consequences in this decision.