Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forum12 Essentialist Oversimplifications About Religion Badly in Need of Theory
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kate-blanchard/12-essentialist-oversimpl_b_6538024.htmlKate Blanchard
Associate Professor of Religious Studies, Alma College
Posted: 01/26/2015 1:09 pm EST Updated: 2 hours ago
The Raw Story published a post with the deliciously satisfying title, "These are the 12 worst ideas religion has unleashed on the world." On the list are a lot of quite terrible ideas, including holy war, genital mutilation, and male ownership of female fertility. Other ideas such as karma, heresy, or "chosen people" may not necessarily be quite as terrible, but certainly do have their long histories of abuses.
Like any good religious studies professor, my first question to such an assertion is, "What is your definition of 'religion' and where did you get it?" For example, the author of this post also refers to "some of humanity's best moral and spiritual concepts," which apparently include creativity, forgiveness, self-discipline, and even ahimsa (made most famous by Gandhi). One would be hard-pressed to find even one religious tradition in human history that didn't celebrate such virtues in some way, but without any justification these qualities are named "moral and spiritual" rather than religious.
Some people like to think that the "essence" of religion is all sweetness and light, while the violence and bigotry for which religious people are famous are unfortunate cultural add-ons. The flip side is the idea expressed in the aforementioned post, that the essence of religion is tribalism and violence, while all the good stuff is "our shared moral core." Both are highly attractive oversimplifications with real-world import. It is not hard to understand, for example, why so many Muslims wish to disown jihadist terrorism as not truly Islamic, or why so many anti-theists wish to unconditionally condemn all of Islam.
But the lovely dream of a tidy line between "religion" and everything else is itself a historical condition, a product of Enlightenment theory and culture, still alive and well despite decades of loud and diverse critiques. Its persistence comes from being so beautifully simple, appealing particularly to the desire to put confusing things in binary categories: reason vs. emotion, mind vs. body, good vs. evil.
more at link
Link to original article: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/these-are-the-12-worst-ideas-religion-has-unleashed-on-the-world/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 939 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
12 Essentialist Oversimplifications About Religion Badly in Need of Theory (Original Post)
cbayer
Jan 2015
OP
immoderate
(20,885 posts)1. The original article was quite coherent.
Blanchard, OTOH, is out to sell some books.
--imm
cbayer
(146,218 posts)2. The original article was click bait crap, imo,
out to sell some ads.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)4. But coherent. Blanchard is marketing *uncertainty.*
Something that exists, but is overdone as a main theme.
--imm
cbayer
(146,218 posts)5. Being simplistic and generally coherent is a hallmark of click bait.
Tampico has made a career out of it.
Blanchard on the other hand is selling books about environmentalism and christianity. I don't see anything about "uncertainty" in her article.
She seems a-ok to me, and frankly, more qualified.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)3. Incidentally, Valerie Tarico is selling her own book.
Only $17.95!
Fix The Stupid
(948 posts)6. Is that an issue for you?
She's selling a book...
I take by your tone you disapprove?
Is it the price?
What about this book? Deserves the same derision?
http://www.chalicepress.com/Reclaiming-the-Christian-Faith-P983C1.aspx
This one is only $14.95! What a steal!
So, what's your beef against people writing religious themed books?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)7. Did you look at the post I was responding to?