Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 04:21 PM Apr 2012

Colorado ‘religious freedom’ initiative moves step closer to 2012 ballot

The Colorado Secretary of State’s title board on Wednesday approved language for a “religious freedom” ballot initiative submitted last month by Colorado Springs-based evangelical organization Focus on the Family. Supporters of the initiative can now begin collecting the roughly 86,000 valid voter signatures it will take to land the proposal on election ballots this November.

The controversial initiative taps into the increasingly heated tug of war over social issues waging between Christian organizations and representatives of the government, most recently, for example, on the question of whether employers should be required to provide insurance coverage for contraception.

As submitted, the title of the initiative contains one sentence. It proposes to add “an amendment to the Colorado Constitution expressing the public policy of the state of Colorado that government may not burden a person’s or religious organization’s freedom of religion (pdf).”

http://coloradoindependent.com/117520/colorado-%E2%80%98religious-freedom%E2%80%99-initiative-moves-one-step-closer-to-2012-ballot

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Colorado ‘religious freedom’ initiative moves step closer to 2012 ballot (Original Post) SecularMotion Apr 2012 OP
Only if I can have an amendment that says any religious sinkingfeeling Apr 2012 #1
How will they feel about edhopper Apr 2012 #2
It looks like the War on Women has begun in earnest. No one is forcing them to take appleannie1 Apr 2012 #3
Theists demand right to intolerance. Taliban enablement act of 2012. Warren Stupidity Apr 2012 #4
What we need is a freedom FROM religion amendment. n/t wandy Apr 2012 #5
If they cared about actual freedom of religion, they wouldn't need to pass a law. darkstar3 Apr 2012 #6

sinkingfeeling

(51,474 posts)
1. Only if I can have an amendment that says any religious
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 04:29 PM
Apr 2012

organization may not burden a person with their beliefs nor may the state pass any law forcing a person to believe in a diety.

edhopper

(33,619 posts)
2. How will they feel about
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 04:29 PM
Apr 2012

Rastafarians smoking weed, or Santeria and animal sacrifice?

Or is it just about allowing people to hate the Gays.

appleannie1

(5,070 posts)
3. It looks like the War on Women has begun in earnest. No one is forcing them to take
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 04:33 PM
Apr 2012

contraceptives if they object to them but they think they should be able to prevent people that want them from using them. It is pure bullpucky. Plus it opens the door for any group to force their loony laws on people.

darkstar3

(8,763 posts)
6. If they cared about actual freedom of religion, they wouldn't need to pass a law.
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 08:21 PM
Apr 2012

The First Amendment takes care of true freedom of religion. This law is to ensure dominance of one religion.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Colorado ‘religious freed...