Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:48 PM Mar 2015

Indiana House passes controversial religious freedom bill


A controversial religious freedom bill that would protect business owners who want to decline to provide services for same-sex couples was passed by Indiana’s State House today, the latest in a larger battle over same-sex marriage and rights.

The bill reflects a national debate over the dividing line between religious liberty and anti-gay discrimination. The question of whether the religious rights of business owners also extend to their for-profit companies has been a flashpoint as part of a larger debate over same-sex marriage. For instance, the bill would protect a wedding photographer who objects to shooting a same-sex wedding.


The Indiana House voted 63 to 31 to approve a hot-button bill that will likely become law, and Republican Gov. Mike Pence said he plans to sign the legislation when it lands on his desk. The state Senate’s version of the bill would prevent the government from “substantially burdening” a person’s exercise of religion unless the government can prove it has a compelling interest and is doing so in the least restrictive means.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/03/23/indiana-house-passes-controversial-religious-freedom-bill/
Creeping theocracy.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Indiana House passes controversial religious freedom bill (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Mar 2015 OP
The compelling interest will be interstate commerce. Hoppy Mar 2015 #1
What? We lost the civil rights battle in the 60's? Well, shit, lets do it all over again. AtheistCrusader Mar 2015 #2
"Compelling interest" would be what, exactly? LiberalAndProud Mar 2015 #3

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
2. What? We lost the civil rights battle in the 60's? Well, shit, lets do it all over again.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:20 PM
Mar 2015

I'm sorry but fuck religion and its apologists forever. This shit cannot stand.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
3. "Compelling interest" would be what, exactly?
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:30 PM
Mar 2015

I don't think it's particularly harmful that a gay couple need not have a homophobic photographer present at their nuptials. On the other hand, it it worrisome that a pharmacist may decline to provide their customers with contraceptives for religious reasons.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Indiana House passes cont...