Religion
Related: About this forumAtheist Blogosphere Weighs in on PZ Myers
April 10, 2015
Posted by Jack Vance at 5:54 AM
After Atheist Ireland issued their statement dissociating from PZ Myers, I wasn't sure what would happen next. Would other individuals and/or organizations sign on, or would the statement be met with uncomfortable silence? Then something I did not expect happened. Atheist Northern Ireland quickly issued a statement on their Facebook page in which they expressed support for Atheist Ireland's statement. The Secular Policy Institute then posed an interesting question about why shock jock bloggers continue to be invited to speak at prominent secular conferences. They noted, "We believe the secular movement should stop rewarding those who cause discord."
Not surprisingly, the atheist blogosphere has been buzzing about these various statements and their implications. This has been an unusually busy week at work, and I am way behind on my reading. I haven't had any time to seek out posts on the topic, so I thought I'd share those that have turned up in my feed and that I have had a chance to read.
I Support Atheist Ireland Against Paul Zachary Myers' Behavior (Avant Garde)
Skeptic group publicly shuns PZ Myers for 'harmful and hateful rhetoric' (Our Daily Train)
Atheist Ireland "Publicly Dissociates" from Blogger PZ Myers (Friendly Atheist)
Atheist Ireland denounces PZ Myers (What Would JT Do?)
Why Atheist Ireland's Dissociation From PZ Myers is Important (Humanisticus)
PZ is Not the Problem (Background Probability)
Hemant Mehta's post appears to have generated some strong reactions from the Freethought Blogs/Skepchick crowd, as he was accused by Rebecca Watson of endorsing "a hate forum." Why does this sort of accusation sound so familiar? Oh, that's right! Hemant runs a hate group. Anyway, Watson's post was sufficiently over-the-line to draw a response from the Center for Inquiry's Ron Lindsay.
My guess is that we will see more people weighing in on this subject. While it does not surprise me that PZ has become the central figure here, I do think that some of the questions being raised and debated are much larger than him or any other one person. We have many options for dealing with bad ideas, and some appear to be far more consistent with freethought than others. This is a topic I have taken up recently and will continue to explore as I find the time to do so.
http://www.atheistrev.com/2015/04/atheist-blogosphere-weighs-in-on-pz.html#ixzz3WwFnx0GI
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Here's the statement:
http://atheist.ie/2015/04/atheist-ireland-dissociates-from-pz-myers/
The author of the OP has linked to those who agree.
longship
(40,416 posts)Meaning that he is a very gentle soul in real life. He often jokes about the fact that his online persona is so divergent to the way he runs his life. He prides himself that he can run such a deliberately noisy Blog and maintain his normally kind demeanor.
Some people see PZ only via his Blog. They would be very wrong to judge him by that alone.
Such a silly non-controversy, IMHO.
Leontius
(2,270 posts)and is just trying to find some little bit of fame and attention. Just another snake oil salesman.
Response to Leontius (Reply #4)
edhopper This message was self-deleted by its author.
longship
(40,416 posts)What I am telling you is that he is an ethical and very nice person, liked by nearly everybody, but who is a smart guy who doesn't suffer utter fools on the Internet lightly.
He is kind of like Christopher Hitchens that way. (Who was also generally a very polite, generous, and well-loved person.)
BTW, I find your response to be flame bait. I won't bite.
My regards.