Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 11:30 AM Apr 2012

Bayard Rustin and The Civil Rights Movement

A short article from the Black Nonbelievers of Chicago; it's a couple of months old but pertinent in light of recent discussion, correcting some "facts" that people have been throwing around.

The Civil Rights Movement and the black church are mutually exclusive. Black churches were used as meeting places to discuss political issues and strategy. They weren’t allowed to hold political meetings in any other place beside the church; therefore, the participation of the black church was needed in an effort to progress justice for all. However, they weren’t the motivating force behind the Civil Rights Movement.

Please note that most black churches weren’t involved. The movement was not totally dependent on the participation of those in the religious community. As a matter of fact, many churches resisted the Civil Rights Movement due to the fact that it was challenging the status quo. The church resented the fact that society was challenging sexism, gender roles and identity, and secularism. There were many in the church that warned and threatened Martin Luther King because they thought he was a troublemaker. How soon we forget.


Lots of links and other prominent names can be found on the page.
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bayard Rustin and The Civil Rights Movement (Original Post) trotsky Apr 2012 OP
Thank you for posting this! eqfan592 Apr 2012 #1
He's claimed by the Quakers as well. rug Apr 2012 #2
You should write and tell the Black Nonbelievers of Chicago. trotsky Apr 2012 #3
Maybe they should have a meet up with the Quakers. rug Apr 2012 #9
Indeed they should. trotsky Apr 2012 #10
They have an extensive roster but Bayard Rustin isn't listed. rug Apr 2012 #11
Too bad for you. n/t trotsky Apr 2012 #12
Yup. Doesn't appear to be a nontheist. rug Apr 2012 #13
Actually, it would be better to say there is debate on the issue. eqfan592 Apr 2012 #16
Correct, which is why I posted #2. rug Apr 2012 #17
They wouldn't be necessary without the implication by a poster that atheists were absent.. eqfan592 Apr 2012 #19
He probably would have thought that. trotsky Apr 2012 #20
You know he died 24 years ago, right? laconicsax Apr 2012 #14
You know they posted a history going back 400 years, right? rug Apr 2012 #15
Well, then maybe you should write to the Black Nonbelievers of Chicago. laconicsax Apr 2012 #18
Could not find nor open the link. Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #4
So let me get this straight Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #5
Did you try clicking the blue, underlined text? laconicsax Apr 2012 #6
Yeah, that worked for me Goblinmonger Apr 2012 #7
Thanks, i found it and it offers a solid answer to my question. nt Thats my opinion Apr 2012 #24
Here is the link, non-embedded: trotsky Apr 2012 #8
Good documentary about Rustin - "Brother Outsider" onager Apr 2012 #21
Fascinating info as usual, onager! trotsky Apr 2012 #22
Kick cleanhippie Apr 2012 #23

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
16. Actually, it would be better to say there is debate on the issue.
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 03:53 PM
Apr 2012

I've found points on both sides, but so far have not found much directly from him stating one way or another.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
17. Correct, which is why I posted #2.
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 03:55 PM
Apr 2012

Somehow I suspect he'd think these turf wars were trivial.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
19. They wouldn't be necessary without the implication by a poster that atheists were absent..
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 04:08 PM
Apr 2012

...from the civil rights movement in the first place. But I agree, he would have thought that.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
20. He probably would have thought that.
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 07:30 PM
Apr 2012

And he would have been right, except for one poster's insistence that the Civil Rights movement could not have happened without believers - and clearly Christians in particular.

Rustin would have absolutely disagreed with that, no matter what nit rug thinks he's going to pick.

Thats my opinion

(2,001 posts)
4. Could not find nor open the link.
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 02:37 PM
Apr 2012

The black church and the civil rights movement were seriously intertwined. It is absurd to say that they were mutually exclusive. The first paragraph in your OP makes that case. Where did that first sentence come from? It is the antithesis of all that follows.

Rustin was a great leader of the socialist movement--which does not make him an atheist.
He helped form the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. He was Gay at time when that was resisted in the church and out. But he persisted to believe that his pacifism came from his early life in the church, and remained a partner of ML King.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
5. So let me get this straight
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 02:40 PM
Apr 2012

In the other thread, you are confused as to why people might not be out as atheists so we wouldn't know if they were atheists working on the civil rights movement.

But now, it makes perfect sense to you that if he were gay, that would be the reason why he wasn't associated with the church.

You're a peach.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
8. Here is the link, non-embedded:
Wed Apr 11, 2012, 02:59 PM
Apr 2012
http://blacknonbelieversofchicago.org/bnoc/node/5

I suggest you take your disagreements with the content and send it to the Black Nonbelievers of Chicago to tell them they're wrong.

onager

(9,356 posts)
21. Good documentary about Rustin - "Brother Outsider"
Thu Apr 12, 2012, 02:04 AM
Apr 2012
http://rustin.org/?page_id=2

I saw it a few weeks ago. At work, no less. And how did I manage that, you might ask?

Well, it was completely legit. My employer encourages us to form groups of like-minded people to do various extracurricular stuff.

In this case, the gay employees group showed the docu, but also tied it in to Black History Month, so the audience was very diverse. Also very BIG - the room was nearly full, which is unusual for these things. But "these things" are usually stuff like bake sales or plant sales etc.

The documentary didn't mention atheism - I was hoping it might. At one point Rustin says he's a pacifist because his grandmother was a Quaker and she had a big influence on him.

Also a lot of good info about Rustin's harassment by racist politicians.

Unfortunately Rustin himself provided some of the ammo. He was busted in 1953 for "public indecency." He was caught in a car, with two men, apparently in flagrante.

The docu shows his original arrest report - he was busted on Green St. in Pasadena, CA. Jebus! That's the very middle of Pasadena - in fact, nowadays the site of the Pasadena Civic Center.

Pasadena is still a conservative, old-money town today and I imagine it was a lot more so in 1953. Amazing.

And to some of our posters in here...cough...most likely Rustin would automatically qualify as an atheist. He was a real card-carrying member of the Communist Party in the 1930's.

Anyway, the documentary is well worth watching for a look at a very complex man.

I might even have spotted some of my relatives in it. That would be the guys wearing the sheets.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Bayard Rustin and The Civ...