Religion
Related: About this forumHow to Bolster Space Exploration: Get Religious Groups Onboard
http://www.space.com/29662-space-exploration-religion-support.htmlby Elizabeth Howell, Space.com Contributor | June 15, 2015 07:00am ET
Space advocates may want to consider approaching religious individuals to boost support for space exploration, according to a recent study in the journal Space Policy.
Credit: NASA
To broaden support for space exploration, advocates should consider approaching religious groups especially in settings that are familiar to that religion, a new study suggests.
The peer-reviewed article by the University of Dayton's Joshua Ambrosius tackles what Ambrosius calls a little-studied topic in the literature: how religion plays into public support of space exploration. The study was detailed in the May 2015 edition of the journal Space Policy.
"While there is growing interest in the intersection of religion and space, little to no scholarship has examined how religious belonging, behavior, and belief could shape views of humanity's future in spaceand by extension, our actual future in space," wrote Ambrosius, who is a political scienceresearcher, in an email to Space.com.
I have always been interested in both religion and space, and thought that this was an intriguing way to further my interest in both.
more at link
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)It makes perfect sense for each religion to have a different philosophy and stance when it comes to the quest for knowledge about the universe.
But on the other side, I think nothing will be gained by trying to use religion to get people interested in exploration:
Why would anybody join a quest for knowledge about the universe when they already have an explanation about the universe?
What could this search for knowledge possibly reveal about the grand schemes of the universe that wasn't already covered in the religious explanation of the universe?
What is the selling-point?
ret5hd
(20,522 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)there is a great deal of variation between how different religious groups approach science, but there is also a positive correlation with how the pastor approaches the subject.
There are lots of selling points and many believers do not hold the position that their religion fully explains the universe.
But, at a very basic level, evangelism could be the selling point, just as it was for exploration of this planet.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Upon hearing that an alien civilization can be reached with a nearby wormhole, televangelists build a spaceship to travel there and convert them to Christianity. The aliens don't understand what they are talking about, because the aliens use the term "Marklar" for every person, object and concept. When the kids explain to them that the missionaries want them to join a new religion and change their culture, the aliens kick the missionaries off their planet.
"They will build Marklars and Marklars! They will take your Marklars and replace them with Marklars!"
cbayer
(146,218 posts)There is a great book about the first trip by humans to a known inhabited planet. It's call the Sparrow. Things don't go well for them either.
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Mankind meets aliens and for some reason an interstellar war starts. As there is no faster-than-light-travel, the war drags on for centuries and time-dilation becomes an important issue. The novel follows William Mandella, a soldier in a special forces unit, as he witnesses how mankind's culture changes between each of his visits to Earth and how mankind itself becomes alien to him.
SPOILER:
At one point, mankind starts using cloning for procreation and it turns out, the aliens have been using cloning the whole time. Now that both sides have psychological/cultural similarities, it is finally possible to negotiate for peace.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Since we don't know, all we can do is imagine.
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)Then at least the fools being parted from their money will be, unwittingly, actually contributing to science.
Sounds like a win/win! I vote "yes".
Julie
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Both NDT and Bill Nye have made the argument that we have to find a way to make the case for science that doesn't completely undermine their beliefs. I think it can be done.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Worked out well for other eras of exploration, if in fact the goal was genocide.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Or read, for that matter.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)While i do stuff. I mean i can, but it'll just sit there not doing anything.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)...... Jeremy Irons reading "Lolita" while driving to Charlotte with a designer to get some stuff we couldn't pick up locally....laughing our asses off the whole way!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Even better than high tempo or loud electronicA/trance/dubstep.
The comedy channels on spotify and pandora are pretty great too.
struggle4progress
(118,349 posts)Meanwhile, my religion teaches me that human beings should be my first concern
I find no religious arguments for something like as limited as space exploration. I find religious arguments for the importance of science, as a process that dignifies, empowers, and instructs humanity. Space exploration is a great idea, but our time and resources are finite, so while I support some space exploration, I think other forms of scientific inquiry may often be more important
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Could end every last living cell on the planet.
Still a bad return on investment?
struggle4progress
(118,349 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Detection, mitigation, destruction of objects, and redundant dispersal of the species. You don't solve the problem of shit hitting earth without full exploration of the solar system.
struggle4progress
(118,349 posts)it currently gets about 1/4 of 1% of NASA's budget; and NASA may not think it needs more funding
Report says scientists lack funds to meet Congressional goal for finding smaller "near-Earth asteroids"
By Robin Lloyd | January 22, 2010
... the $4 million in annual funding that several major NEO detection programs receive is nowhere near enough to meet a 2020 deadline set by Congress in 2005 for scientists to find 90 percent of near-Earth objects greater than 140-meters in diameterspace rocks of this size are likely to cause regional, rather than global, damage, though global damage is still possible. The mandate has yet to receive any funding. One of these regional-threat objects strikes Earth on average every 30,000 years ...
NASA to Congress: dont pour money into NEO programs
By Jeff Foust
2013 March 20 at 7:19 am ET
... at a hearing Tuesday on the issue by the House Science Committee, NASA administrator Charles Bolden seemed to downplay the threat and ask that additional money not be allocated to NEO programsat least not at the expense of other NASA programs. We could come out of this hearing and decide that we really want to pour money into NEO detection and characterization, and that would not be the right thing to do, Bolden said ... Boldens rationale was that NEO impacts large enough to pose a threat were rare events. The probability of any sizable NEO impacting Earth any time in the next 100 years is extremely remote ... Bolden also admitted that current funding provided to NASA for its NEO work ($20.5 million in FY2012, up from just $4 million a few years earlier) was not sufficient to achieve the goal in NASAs 2005 authorization act to discover 90 percent of the NEOs at least 140 meters in diameter by 2020 ...
White House Proposes $18.5 Billion Budget For NASA In 2016
February 2, 2015
Curtiss Thompson
... Under the proposed budget, NASAs Near Earth Object Program, which focuses on finding and tracking potentially hazardous asteroids and comets, would receive $50 million in 2016, an increase of $10 million. This comes after the agencys NEO Program saw its budget doubled following the Chelyabinsk meteor that exploded over Russia in 2013 injuring more than 1,000 people on the ground ...
cbayer
(146,218 posts)But that doesn't mean we should abandon those things that don't make the cut right now.
Exploration is important, imo. We may need another planet in the not so distant future, as it appears we may have ruined this one.
struggle4progress
(118,349 posts)For Venus, The atmospheric pressure at the planet's surface is 92 times that of Earth's. With a mean surface temperature of 735 K (462 °C; 863 °F), Venus is by far the hottest planet in the Solar System
Mars has very little atmosphere and almost no magnetic field, so there's little shielding of the surface from solar radiation. Mars's atmosphere is about 100 times thinner than Earth's. Without a "thermal blanket," Mars can't retain any heat energy. On average, the temperature on Mars is about minus 80 degrees F (minus 60 degrees C). In winter, near the poles temperatures can get down to minus 195 degrees F (minus 125 degrees C). A summer day on Mars may get up to 70 degrees F (20 degrees C) near the equator, but at night the temperature can plummet to about minus 100 degrees F (minus 73 C). Frost forms on the rocks at night, but as dawn approaches and the air gets warmer, the frost turns to vapor, and there is 100 percent humidity until it evaporates
If we can't make a go of it here, then it's lights out for us
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Your usual posting habits include spamming links on the subject, but here you just posted a woefully uninformed opinion and left it at that.
Just plug in "benefits of space exploration" into google and go off the e races like you usually do.
struggle4progress
(118,349 posts)Or do you mean I don't really think that?
You object to the idea "human beings should be my first concern"?
Or you feel that I'm misrepresenting my religious views when I say that's what my religion teaches?
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)It's amusimg to me how many here when called out list everything but what they were called out for, including stuff that wasn't even in their post.
Not only are you wrong, but you used a right wing talking point. One they have been using to try and get rid of NASA.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Ugh!
They'll just bring in a bunch of stupid crap that no one needs to care about...but we'll "have to".
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I guess we should leave out all groups that you don't ally yourself with, yes? They'll just bring up stupid crap that no one (and by no one, I think you mean you) needs to care about.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Anything at all.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)But other than that...
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)We'd have to pray before opening the solar panels.....
We'd have to exclude some acts or other on some days.....
Some male astronauts couldn't sit next to a female astronaut.....
We'd have to not ask certain questions about what we were discovering because they are not for us to know or something...
Someone would have to design the space helmets and suits so someone can wear a head scarf or turban or shawl or magic underwear or something under it....
etc etc
"Christ on a cracker! We're decompressing!!!!"
"Well, it was time to release a dove into outer space....praise god!"
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)With tech priests lighting incense and chanting for hours before pressing the "on"button.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)perceptions or experiences.
I'd almost say it's poe-like, if I thought for a second that you are genuinely expressing what you believe to be true.
That's cool. I suspect you won't be a part of the program, so they can probably go ahead without disturbing your sensibilities in any way whatsoever.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)I suppose you're like your husband where people post you links to all this stuff and you just say "i don't see any links" at leat you haven't compared gay marrige to beastality.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)....are based on religion.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Religious people fervently following absurd and time consuming tho' ridiculous and sometime dangerous rituals and restrictions is only in my mind????
Alrighty then!
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)until women are evicted from seats next to them or anything.
"poe-like" yes indeed one cannot successfully mock religion as whatever mockery one comes up with, somebody is actually doing that seriously. I don't think you know what that phrase actually means. Your use up above supports the argument you are opposing.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Get them all on board a huge spaceship and tell them they are being sent to heaven. Who wouldn't want to go?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)but it would serve the purpose of eliminating them. That's your intent, right?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)I also suspect not many would. However, if they did, I'd consider it a bonus.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)would go the way of the dinosaurs, then?
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Wed Jun 17, 2015, 10:41 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I agree. Get all religious groups on board
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1218&pid=205164
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Let's not.
This is a monumentally bad idea to be proposed on a Democratic site.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Jun 17, 2015, 10:52 AM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Chill out.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Dear Alerter, in future please argue your point in the thread rather than wasting a jury's time on this weak-ass bullshit alert. For what it's worth that is a damned find idea, the planet would be so much better off without religion, and it's small-minded, weak-willed followers.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's too abstract to be wishing any actual bad on any DUer. The poster does show dislike if not hatred of religious people, but it's mildly stated here in a way that cannot really happen.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: These humor-challenged alerts are getting kind of old.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Goodness. Clearly some sardonic humor.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)nt
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Yorktown
(2,884 posts)Why not invoke dead ancestors while doing scientific experiments:
blends the wealth of experience of two different 'sources of wisdom'
Then we should explore the role of religion in quantum mechanics.
So many diverse new interactions woefully unexplored up to now.
One wonders why..