Religion
Related: About this forumWhen Rationalists Reinvent Religion
August 12, 2015
by Adam Lee
I enjoyed this story by Dylan Matthews on Vox about effective altruism, an idea Im all in favor of and wanted to say more about.
EA is the philosophy that we should use science, rather than warm fuzzy feelings or guesswork, to direct our charitable giving where it will do the most good. Compared to the enormous need in the world, the amount of money and energy available for charity is small to begin with, and too many of those scarce and precious dollars and volunteer hours have been squandered on feel-good projects that made no lasting difference. (Celebrity-run charities seem especially susceptible to this problem.) Meanwhile, humbler and cheaper interventions, like bed nets or deworming pills or iodine supplements or even just giving money to the poor directly can have far more of an impact, using the standard measure of DALYs.
So far, so good; theres nothing here Id argue with. As a universal utilitarian, I want to do the most good I can with the finite resources I have available. But effective altruism has a dark side, capably if unflatteringly showcased by the Vox article.
Specifically, many of EAs most fervent advocates are wealthy, white, male, tech-obsessed futurists, and that shapes their view of what counts as a pressing problem. A large number of them argue that existential risk, or X-risk extinction-level events for the human species, like meteor impact, alien invasion, or the emergence of evil artificial intelligence ought to take precedence above all else. As Matthews article puts it:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightatheism/2015/08/when-rationalists-reinvent-religion/
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I see no discussion of rationalism, no discussion of religion, so why the title?
Jim__
(14,077 posts)Most humans are empathetic and helping people makes us feel good. Since this seems to be a selected trait, we should give it some weight. Far out scenarios that may have near infinite benefits, are unlikely to have been computed correctly. His comparison to Pascal's Wager is fitting.