Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 12:45 PM Nov 2015

Publisher of atheist books hacked to death in Bangladesh

http://www.christiantoday.com/article/publisher.of.atheist.books.hacked.to.death.in.bangladesh/69388.htm

A publisher of secular and atheist books was hacked to death in Bangladesh on Saturday, according to police. In a separate attack hours earlier, two secular writers and a publisher were shot and stabbed at a publishing house in Dhaka.

A local affiliate of al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the attacks, according to the BBC.

There have been a series of attacks targeting secularists since blogger Avijit Roy was hacked to death in February.

...

They accused the "secular and atheist publishers" of publishing books by blasphemers which dishonoured the Prophet Muhammed, and threatened furher attacks.


Well, Pope Awesome himself said no one should insult someone else's religion, and that physical violence is to be expected if you do.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Publisher of atheist books hacked to death in Bangladesh (Original Post) trotsky Nov 2015 OP
He said that? haikugal Nov 2015 #1
He did indeed. trotsky Nov 2015 #2
Amazing... haikugal Nov 2015 #3
This is exactly what he said. rug Nov 2015 #5
How is that different from what Trotsky said? haikugal Nov 2015 #6
You tell me. rug Nov 2015 #7
Only in degree... haikugal Nov 2015 #8
You're talking bollocks. A punch is physical violence. muriel_volestrangler Nov 2015 #11
Yes, he was just swinging away on that flight, wasn't he, muriel? rug Nov 2015 #12
It's physical violence. That's what has been said, multiple times, and you persist in pretending muriel_volestrangler Nov 2015 #13
It's an off-the-cuff remark about someone insulting his mother. rug Nov 2015 #14
It's a remark about insulting the faith of others, which he says is provocation muriel_volestrangler Nov 2015 #15
Note the slide away from didn't say it to off the cuff. Warren Stupidity Nov 2015 #16
Note the indirect attack. rug Nov 2015 #19
It's surely not about hacking people to death. rug Nov 2015 #18
It's a direct comparisson Lordquinton Nov 2015 #17
Old threads. rug Nov 2015 #4
The Pope's remark was even more disgusting in context Yorktown Nov 2015 #9
That's true, the context is crucial. trotsky Nov 2015 #10

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
2. He did indeed.
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 12:52 PM
Nov 2015
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-30838667

Pope Francis has defended the right to freedom of expression but has said it was wrong to provoke others by insulting their religion.

His comments followed the fatal attack on the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris last week.

To illustrate his point, the pontiff told journalists on the papal plane his assistant could expect a punch if he ''cursed his mother''.

''It's normal - you cannot provoke, you cannot insult the faith of others,'' he said.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
3. Amazing...
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 12:59 PM
Nov 2015

Here it is 2015 and we're still being told to stay in the closet or face the violent consequences...

Thanks Trotsky

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
6. How is that different from what Trotsky said?
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 04:11 PM
Nov 2015

The Pope seems to think it's normal to punch someone if you feel you've been insulted. Given how victimized and insulted so many religious folk are these days I guess we should expect some form of violence...

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
7. You tell me.
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 04:24 PM
Nov 2015

He posts this:

Publisher of atheist books hacked to death in Bangladesh

And then says this:

Well, Pope Awesome himself said no one should insult someone else's religion, and that physical violence is to be expected if you do.

It's not even false equivalence. It's rank dishonesty.

haikugal

(6,476 posts)
8. Only in degree...
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 04:28 PM
Nov 2015

Pope said expect violence....what has happened to people who speak out about disbelief historically? Violence of one form or another. Pope says "hey, that's the way it is"

muriel_volestrangler

(101,367 posts)
11. You're talking bollocks. A punch is physical violence.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:05 AM
Nov 2015

The pope did say physical violence is "normal" if you " insult the faith of others". But you often accuse DUers of dishonesty rather than facing up to the realities of your sect. Par for the course for you.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
12. Yes, he was just swinging away on that flight, wasn't he, muriel?
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:12 AM
Nov 2015

What is bollocks, times two, is your equating this remark with the hacking death of human beings.

And, since you mention it, it's bollocks steeped in dishonesty.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,367 posts)
13. It's physical violence. That's what has been said, multiple times, and you persist in pretending
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:14 AM
Nov 2015

that anyone has equated that with hacking someone to death. You are just making shit up to accuse people of dishonesty. Everyone here can read, you know. It's only your own guilty conscience over what Francis said that you're having an effect on.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
14. It's an off-the-cuff remark about someone insulting his mother.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 11:21 AM
Nov 2015

You, in your self-righteousness and high-minded integrity, relate that to hacking someone to death.

It's not only dishonest bollocks, it's idiocy that cannot survive even a languid use of reason.

Don't you worry a bit about my conscience, muriel, check your own.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,367 posts)
15. It's a remark about insulting the faith of others, which he says is provocation
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 12:00 PM
Nov 2015

The subject was speech seen as insulting a religion, and he said there are limits to freedom of expression. He used the example of someone insulting his mother as something that would provoke violence, and said he brought that up as an example that there are 'normal' reactions of violence to provocation.

Yet again, you accuse a DUer of dishonesty by fantasizing about what has been said in this thread. You are consistently polluting the thread with bullshit.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
16. Note the slide away from didn't say it to off the cuff.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 02:28 PM
Nov 2015

As soon as one argument becomes untenable the apologist just shifts to a new argument, as if the prior failed effort never occurred.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
19. Note the indirect attack.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:52 PM
Nov 2015

Keep reading the thread, warren. I expect there will be some remarks about lack of integrity coming up.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
18. It's surely not about hacking people to death.
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 04:50 PM
Nov 2015

I don't think loving his mother is a religious doctrine.

The bullshit in this thread comes from trotsky's remark in the OP.

It's interesting you and your cohorts - dishonestly - try to turn a serious incident involving a murder into a rather an opportunity to equate the Pope with encouraging it.

That is the bullshit and that is the dishonesty.

Lordquinton

(7,886 posts)
17. It's a direct comparisson
Wed Nov 4, 2015, 03:51 PM
Nov 2015

Francis said it about the Charlie Hebdo massacre. He made that comment in response to atheists getting murdered for insulting religion. Francis said that violent retaliation was normal in responce to an insult when Publisher(s) of atheist books hacked(shot) to death in Bangladesh(Paris).

This directly applies, to claim otherwise is "rank dishonesty."

 

Yorktown

(2,884 posts)
9. The Pope's remark was even more disgusting in context
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:13 AM
Nov 2015

Mr Nice_Smile Pope condoned violence against mockers of religion..

..just after the murders at Charlie Hebdo.


Forget about turning the other cheek, it was the right Christian comment to make.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
10. That's true, the context is crucial.
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 12:24 PM
Nov 2015

Horrible violence in the name of religion had JUST occurred. The universal response should have been "murder is NEVER an acceptable response to being offended." But instead we had from this pope, as well as a surprisingly loud group of DUers, that somehow those who offend the religious beliefs of others should keep quiet, and that when people react violently, it should have been expected.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Publisher of atheist book...