Religion
Related: About this forumCourt To Catholic School: No, You Can’t Fire People Because They Are Gay
Plaintiff Matthew Barrett had applied for a job at Fontbonne Academy, a Catholic prep school for girls in Milton, Massachusetts, as a Food Services Director. After several interviews, he was offered the job. On his new hire form, Barrett listed his husband as his emergency contact. Two days later, Fontbonne informed him that he could not have the job because his marriage was inconsistent with the teachings of the Catholic Church.
Fontbonne defended the decision, claiming its belief about the definition of marriage had nothing to do with sexual orientation. In fact, the school includes sexual orientation in its own nondiscrimination statement. But Associate Justice Douglas H. Wilkins found this distinction wholly unconvincing. It is no answer to say that Fontbonne denied Barrett employment because he was in a same-sex marriage, not because of his sexual orientation, he wrote. The law recognizes no such distinction.
--snip--
GLAD, the LGBT legal organization that represented Barrett, praised the ruling. Religious-affiliated organizations do not get a free pass to discriminate against gay and lesbian people, senior attorney Bennett Klein said in a statement. When Fontbonne fired Matt from a job that has nothing to do with religion, and simply because he is married, they came down on the wrong side of the law.
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/12/17/3733518/massachusetts-catholic-school-anti-gay-discrimination/
The RCC seems to be as bigoted and homophobic as the WBC clan. Two peas in a pod, if you will. And they have plenty of shysters to keep trying to find legal loopholes so they can continue their hateful discrimination.
And until the Laity steps up and demands change or stops filling the pews and coffers, nothing will change.
deathrind
(1,786 posts)Either be a church or a business but you cannot be both.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Unfortunately this only applies to Massachusetts. SCOTUS seems to think that RFRA, intended to prevent the police from jailing peyote drinking native americans, allows organizations to practice overt bigotry.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Cause overt bigotry is inexcusable. That it's a part of the sacred religion only makes it worse. That they changed parts of their religion recently shows that it's intentional bigotry.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Religion cannot be allowed to trump human rights.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)When they couldn't discriminate against gay adoptive couples, rather than do the right thing in Boston, they closed their entire adoptive services.
Cutting off their own nose to pointlessly injure non-Catholic gay people.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/boston-archdiocese-stops-adoption-work/
The motherfuckers are so damned determined to be vicious bigoted assholes, they'd rather kill the service than allow gay people in the door.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)To most of us, at least.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)They want to make sure the right people are punished, and it's clear who they think the right people are.