Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:14 PM Apr 2016

The Vatican Just Put a Convicted Rapist Back in a Parish

Just what is it that the Vatican does not get about predator priests? Apparently a lot.

Father Joseph Jeyapaul is a priest from India who admitted to raping two adolescent girls in Minnesota when he served the Crookston diocese from 2004 to 2005.

After being charged with the abuse, which included rape and forcing at least one of the girls to perform fellatio on him, he fled home to India, where he was eventually arrested on an Interpol warrant. He was then extradited back to Minnesota, where he admitted his heinous crimes and entered a plea bargain in which, in exchange for a lighter sentence, he copped to molestation of one of the girls.

Jeyapaul was suspended from the priesthood and served a year and a day in prison in Minnesota, then was deported back to India after his release last July. The Minnesota diocese where he worked also settled a civil lawsuit with the victims in which one accused him of systematic abuse in the confessional of the Blessed Sacrament Church in Greenbush, Minnesota, where he would then tell the girl it was her fault, that she had made him “impure.”

How much more proof would one need that the man cannot be trusted with minors?

Apparently, Jeyapaul’s rap sheet is not enough to kick him out of the priesthood for good. In February, the Vatican approved lifting his suspension from the priesthood and agreed that he could be reassigned to a new parish in India. That parish even made him the diocesan head of its commission for education.

....

DailyBeast
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Vatican Just Put a Convicted Rapist Back in a Parish (Original Post) Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 OP
Nice to know that Denny Hastert has a job waiting for him Kelvin Mace Apr 2016 #1
No doubt the usual suspects here on DU skepticscott Apr 2016 #2
Well I certainly don't have an "irrational" hatred of the rcc - mr blur Apr 2016 #4
The defenders of child rapists skepticscott Apr 2016 #6
Passing the Plate for Pedophiles Skittles Apr 2016 #13
Not convicted of rape: the state decided it would have trouble winning conviction struggle4progress Apr 2016 #3
So,you don't believe edhopper Apr 2016 #5
Headline ("convicted rapist") is inaccurate struggle4progress Apr 2016 #7
So if a grown man who is a Priest edhopper Apr 2016 #17
People, who want to learn to think in a scientific manner, must learn to say struggle4progress Apr 2016 #18
And some people edhopper Apr 2016 #19
Wow! Who knew that forcing child to have sex with you ISN'T child-rape! S4P set us straight! cleanhippie Apr 2016 #20
Hey, as long as they weren't convicted of it skepticscott Apr 2016 #21
As predicted skepticscott Apr 2016 #8
Wow. Just wow. cleanhippie Apr 2016 #9
You're not a stickler for accuracy? struggle4progress Apr 2016 #10
I'm a stickler for calling child rape what it is: child rape. Apparently you're not. cleanhippie Apr 2016 #11
How odd you never post a story about child rape that does not involve a priest. rug Apr 2016 #12
It would be odd to post about that in the religion group if it didn't involve a priest. cleanhippie Apr 2016 #14
You don't post about it anywhere. rug Apr 2016 #15
If by my agenda, you mean bringing attention to things you'd rather avoid, then you betcha! cleanhippie Apr 2016 #16
 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
2. No doubt the usual suspects here on DU
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 12:51 PM
Apr 2016

Will be here to defend this any time now..what is it that THEY don't get about predator rapist priests and their enablers?

So what will it be this time? The trite old accusations of "bigotry" or "irrational" hatred of the rcc? Or just the standard alert trolling, hoping that a dishonest alert will get a 4-3 hide of someone pointing out how despicable this, (and anyone who defends it) is?

Go for it.

 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
4. Well I certainly don't have an "irrational" hatred of the rcc -
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 04:53 PM
Apr 2016

It's very rational.
And in fact it's not a "hatred". Hate is a strong emotion that must be parcelled out carefully. I wouldn't waste it on the RCC. "Despite" is a much more accurate term.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
6. The defenders of child rapists
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 06:30 PM
Apr 2016

have to pretend that it's "irrational", though. If they didn't make themselves believe that, their whole catholic-based world would come crashing down.

edhopper

(33,594 posts)
5. So,you don't believe
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 06:09 PM
Apr 2016

the children's accounts. You think the Priest didn't force himself on them.
I guess we know who's side you are on.

struggle4progress

(118,309 posts)
7. Headline ("convicted rapist") is inaccurate
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 06:30 PM
Apr 2016

Accuracy is an excellent habit, well worth cultivating IMO

I suppose YMMV

edhopper

(33,594 posts)
17. So if a grown man who is a Priest
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 11:49 PM
Apr 2016

forces a young girl to suck his cock, you won't call it rape if the pissant DA doesn't have the guts to prosecute.
Not rape.

I think that is an accurate account of your views.

Nobody on WallStreet acted criminally before the crash, cause no prosicutilons.
No Bush official committed war crimes or actually ordered torture, no prosicutilons.

All are innocent to be"accurate".

struggle4progress

(118,309 posts)
18. People, who want to learn to think in a scientific manner, must learn to say
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:23 AM
Apr 2016

"I don't know"

It is a condicio sine qua non of scientific thought

edhopper

(33,594 posts)
19. And some people
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:58 AM
Apr 2016

decide to be willfully blind.

Using legal definitions of innocence to claim it's scientific is laughable.

Keep digging in your obfuscation trench.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
20. Wow! Who knew that forcing child to have sex with you ISN'T child-rape! S4P set us straight!
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 11:14 AM
Apr 2016

What. The. Fuck.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
21. Hey, as long as they weren't convicted of it
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 02:10 PM
Apr 2016

that means they didn't do it, right?? Even though they confessed to it.

struggle4progress

(118,309 posts)
10. You're not a stickler for accuracy?
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 09:19 PM
Apr 2016

Or do you have a special gift that enables you to discern facts about events at a distance?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
14. It would be odd to post about that in the religion group if it didn't involve a priest.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 09:34 PM
Apr 2016

Anything to deflect from catholic priests raping children though, rug, amirite?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
15. You don't post about it anywhere.
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 09:46 PM
Apr 2016

Willing to use anything, even child rape, to feed your seething hatred of anything or anyone religious.

Two days ago it was a dead child.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1218227667

Today it's a raped child.

Anything to fuel your agenda. Amirite, cleanhippie?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
16. If by my agenda, you mean bringing attention to things you'd rather avoid, then you betcha!
Mon Apr 25, 2016, 10:32 PM
Apr 2016

Feed that last word compulsion now. I'm done with you.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»The Vatican Just Put a Co...