Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 06:14 PM Apr 2016

Religious-Liberty Laws That Have No Meaning

Tennessee is just the latest state to pass legislation claiming to protect conservatives who object to LGBT relationships and identity.

JONATHAN MERRITT 7:00 AM ET

An overwhelming three-fourths of Americans identify as religious. Listening to some religious conservatives in the U.S., though, one might think believers were a persecuted minority on the verge of extinction. In the name of protecting the sincerely held beliefs of religious Americans, conservative lawmakers and lobbyists have introduced a spate of controversial religious-freedom legislation in recent months. But apparently Melissa McCarthy and Kristen Wiig aren’t the only ones fighting ghosts in 2016. The problems these bills claim to solve don’t actually exist.

In Tennessee, conservative legislators just passed a bill allowing counselors to refuse to provide mental-health services to patients if it would violate their “sincerely held religious belief,” which Governor Bill Haslam signed into law on Wednesday. The legislation was promoted by the Family Action Council of Tennessee, a conservative organization whose president once decried the American Psychiatry Association’s decision to remove homosexuality from its list of mental disorders. Opponents of the bill claim it allows discrimination against LGBT patients, particularly in rural areas where mental-health care is not widely accessible, but conservatives claim counselors’ freedom to live according to their convictions is at risk.

The bill is bold—it provides an explicit religious exemption for mental-health professionals who object to LGBT relationships and identity. But it’s unclear what has motivated it. In interviews, several Christian counselors across Tennessee and the heads of two national Christian counseling organizations said they didn’t know of any mental-health providers who felt their religious liberty was at stake.

“I do not personally know any counselor who will not see a gay person,” said Evon Flesberg, a pastoral therapist in Brentwood, Tennessee, and a counseling professor at Vanderbilt Divinity School. “I think this is the legislature trying to make a point rather than solve a problem.”

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/04/religious-liberty-laws-that-have-no-meaning/480297/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Religious-Liberty Laws That Have No Meaning (Original Post) rug Apr 2016 OP
They should be required to publicly post their individual exceptions. Downwinder Apr 2016 #1
Thes laws are no more than Trojan horses. rug Apr 2016 #2
They aren't even that Major Nikon Apr 2016 #3
Can a Protestant doctor refuse to treat a Catholic? Brettongarcia Apr 2016 #4

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
1. They should be required to publicly post their individual exceptions.
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 06:22 PM
Apr 2016

Then I will know to stay away to begin with.

As it is I just know to stay away from the State.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
3. They aren't even that
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 01:03 AM
Apr 2016

In many cases, federal law trumps them anyway. They are nothing more than a way for lawmakers to pander to a constituency that uses religion to justify their bigotries.

Brettongarcia

(2,262 posts)
4. Can a Protestant doctor refuse to treat a Catholic?
Fri Apr 29, 2016, 10:46 AM
Apr 2016

Our grandstanding legislators haven't really thought through the larger implications.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Religious-Liberty Laws Th...