Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 07:53 AM Jun 2016

SCOTUS Refuses to Hear Pharmacists’ Religious Liberty Case, Over Conservative Dissent

by Sam Reisman | 5:26 pm, June 28th, 2016

Over conservative dissent, the Supreme Court has refused to hear a religious liberty case, in which pharmacists challenged a Washington State regulation mandating that pharmacies dispense emergency contraception, such as Plan B, the so-called “morning after pill.”

The plaintiffs, the Stormans family, are Christians who own and operate a pharmacy and grocery store in Olympia, Wash. They filed suit against the secretary of the Washington State Department of Health over a state regulation that forbids pharmacies from “refus[ing] to deliver a drug or device to a patient because its owner objects to delivery on religious, moral or other personal grounds.”

In a dissent, Justice Samuel Alito called the case “an ominous sign.” He was joined in his dissent by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas.

Alito claimed that there was evidence to suggest the state law served no legitimate purpose and, further, existed only because of “hostility to pharmacists whose religious beliefs regarding abortion and contraception are out of step with the prevailing opinion in the State.”

http://www.mediaite.com/online/scotus-refuses-to-hear-pharmacists-religious-liberty-case-over-conservative-dissent/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS Refuses to Hear Pharmacists’ Religious Liberty Case, Over Conservative Dissent (Original Post) rug Jun 2016 OP
The Stormans need to find another line of work. Hoppy Jun 2016 #1
Ahhhh, yeah...they're probably not THAT religious. CincyDem Jun 2016 #2

CincyDem

(6,363 posts)
2. Ahhhh, yeah...they're probably not THAT religious.
Wed Jun 29, 2016, 08:29 AM
Jun 2016

Only religious enough to demand others change their life/habits/beliefs/rights...not religious enough to change theirs.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»SCOTUS Refuses to Hear Ph...