Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue Aug 9, 2016, 09:02 AM Aug 2016

Most churchgoers are hearing politics from the pulpit: report

By Emily McFarlan Miller | 15 hours ago

(RNS) Most American churchgoers are hearing politics from the pulpits of their churches during this presidential election season, according to a new survey.

Nearly two-thirds of the respondents (64 percent) in the survey released Monday (Aug. 8) by the Pew Research Center say their clergy have spoken about at least one political or social issue in the spring and early summer.

And 14 percent said their pastors even have spoken about a specific presidential candidate. That’s even though churches can be stripped of tax-exempt status for endorsing or opposing a candidate under the Johnson Amendment, which both Donald Trump and the Republican Party platform have said they want to repeal.

But more than three-quarters of all recent churchgoers say the political talk happens “only sometimes, rarely or never."

http://religionnews.com/2016/08/08/most-churchgoers-are-hearing-politics-from-the-pulpit-report/

http://www.pewforum.org/2016/08/08/many-americans-hear-politics-from-the-pulpit/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most churchgoers are hearing politics from the pulpit: report (Original Post) rug Aug 2016 OP
Remind me again what benefit we get by exempting churches from taxes. Jerry442 Aug 2016 #1
The bias has been, according to the articles, pro-Clinton. Igel Aug 2016 #2
Meh. Few hear anything. Igel Aug 2016 #3

Igel

(35,374 posts)
2. The bias has been, according to the articles, pro-Clinton.
Tue Aug 9, 2016, 04:38 PM
Aug 2016

Or anti-Trump, which for many amounts to the same thing.

I have to wonder how many respondents have heard a "pox on both their houses" commentary.

As for the rest, churches uphold a set of doctrines which includes a moral code. Their function is to preach their doctrine. Saying, "Sorry, we've gotten around to making your doctrine a political issue, so that means immediately you can't defend yourself against the changes we're making" is insane. No law prevents this--just personal interpretations and definitions of the law.

They can't take sides in a political campaign. "Political campaign" has a fixed definition that depends neither on your or my understanding of the word. Consider it jargon, if you want, or the more common phrase "technical term."

Igel

(35,374 posts)
3. Meh. Few hear anything.
Tue Aug 9, 2016, 04:46 PM
Aug 2016

But most will assume that this violates the law. It doesn't.

So, once and for all, the definition of "political campaign" and what it means to intervene in one. There are squishy areas, but those are squishy.

The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations
https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/the-restriction-of-political-campaign-intervention-by-section-501-c-3-tax-exempt-organizations

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances. For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity. In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not be prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner.

On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.
Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 15-Dec-2015



https://www.irs.gov/PUP/charities/charitable/Avoid%20Political%20Campaign%20Intervention.pdf
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don’t know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or
more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate
endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or
opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the
distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate
for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office

Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates’ positions and/or actions

Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election

Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election

Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Most churchgoers are hear...