Religion
Related: About this forumThe Great Fire of London Was Blamed on Religious Terrorism
Why scores of Londoners thought the fire of 1666 was all part of a nefarious Catholic conspiracy
Oil painting of the Great Fire, seen from Newgate. ((C) Museum of London)
By Linda Rodriguez McRobbie
September 2, 2016 8:58AM
The rumors spread faster than the blaze that engulfed London over five days in September 1666: that the fire raging through the citys dense heart was no accident it was deliberate arson, an act of terror, the start of a battle. England was at war with both the Dutch and the French, after all. The fire was a softening of the city ahead of an invasion, or they were already here, whoever they were. Or maybe it was the Catholics, whod long plotted the downfall of the Protestant nation.
Londoners responded in kind.
Before the flames were out, a Dutch baker was dragged from his bakery while an angry mob tore it apart. A Swedish diplomat was nearly hung, saved only by the Duke of York who happened to see him and demand he be let down. A blacksmith felled a Frenchman in the street with a vicious blow with an iron bar; a witness recalled seeing his innocent blood flowing in a plentiful stream down his ankles. A French womans breasts were cut off by Londoners who thought the chicks she carried in her apron were incendiaries. Another Frenchman was nearly dismembered by a mob that thought that he was carrying a chest of bombs; the bombs were tennis balls.
The need to blame somebody was very, very strong, attests Adrian Tinniswood, author of By Permission of Heaven: The Story of the Great Fire. The Londoners felt that It cant have been an accident, it cant be God visiting this upon us, especially after the plague, this has to be an act of war.
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/great-fire-london-was-blamed-religious-terrorism-180960332/?no-ist
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)Like a tall bully, lifts the head, and lies.