Religion
Related: About this forumMost British scientists cited in study feel Richard Dawkins’ work misrepresents science
AMY MCCAIG OCTOBER 31, 2016
Controversial British evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins is well-known for his criticism of religion, but a new Rice University study of British scientists reveals that a majority who mentioned Dawkins work during research interviews reject his approach to public engagement and said his work misrepresents science and scientists because he conveys the wrong impression about what science can do and the norms that scientists observe in their work.
The findings in Responding to Richard: Celebrity and (Mis)representation of Science appeared in a recent edition of Public Understandings of Science and are part of a larger Religion Among Scientists in International Context study. The RASIC study includes a survey of over 20,000 scientists from eight countries. In the United Kingdom, 1,581 randomly sampled scientists participated in the survey, and 137 of them also participated in in-depth interviews.
Although the researchers did not ask questions about Dawkins, 48 scientists mentioned him during in-depth interviews without prompting, and nearly 80 percent of those scientists believe that he misrepresents science and scientists in his books and public engagements. This group included 23 nonreligious scientists and 15 religious scientists. Approximately 20 percent of scientists interviewed 10 scientists all identifying as nonreligious said that he plays an important role in asserting the cultural authority of science in the public sphere. One biologist surveyed said Dawkins has quite an important place in society in his criticism of creationism and intelligent design.
Elaine Howard Ecklund, the studys principal investigator and the Herbert S. Autrey Chair in Social Sciences at Rice, said that some scientists, independent of their religious beliefs, do not view Dawkins as a good representative because they believe he conveys the wrong impression about the borders of scientific inquiry.
http://news.rice.edu/2016/10/31/most-british-scientists-cited-in-study-feel-richard-dawkins-work-misrepresents-science-2/
http://pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2016/10/06/0963662516673501.abstract
jonno99
(2,620 posts)Dawkins has gone on a crusade, basically, another professor of biology said. Although there is a lot of truth behind what he says, he does it in a way that I think is deliberately designed to alienate religious people.
rug
(82,333 posts)I think the gist of the complaints is that he is appealing to the authority of science - and his own authority as a biologist - to bolster his own opinion in theology. That would be a misuse of science.