Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 08:50 AM Jan 2017

Spokane City Council votes 7-0 against religious registry



The Spokane City Council chambers is filled to near capacity on January 30, 2017 as the council prepared to discuss an ordinance that would prevent city employees from complying with federal orders to create a registry of citizens based on religious beliefs. (Kip Hill / The Spokesman-Review)

MONDAY, JAN. 30, 2017, 11:05 P.M.
By Kip Hill

An impassioned crowd that spilled out of the City Council chambers Monday night mostly implored lawmakers to pass a law that would prohibit Spokane employees from assisting in the creation of a registry based on religious preference.

And the Spokane City Council did just that – unanimously. To the sound of cheers and applause, the council voted 7-0 to approve an ordinance that outlaws any city employee from participating in the development of “a program that requires, or has the effect of requiring, persons to register on the basis of religious affiliation, belief, or conduct.”

“We have many refugees, and people of different faiths, who live in our community, and they are scared,” City Council President Ben Stuckart said.

Opponents accused Stuckart of grandstanding for political purposes and making a boogeyman out of President Donald Trump.

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2017/jan/30/spokane-city-council-to-ask-employees-not-to-compl/
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Spokane City Council votes 7-0 against religious registry (Original Post) rug Jan 2017 OP
It's sad that ordinances like this are considered necessary in the US. Jim__ Jan 2017 #1
The country survived Reagan, and Nixon, and Bush. guillaumeb Jan 2017 #2
Making the statement is often more important than the ordinance. rug Jan 2017 #3

Jim__

(14,077 posts)
1. It's sad that ordinances like this are considered necessary in the US.
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 11:53 AM
Jan 2017

We won't make it through 4 years of Trump.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
2. The country survived Reagan, and Nixon, and Bush.
Tue Jan 31, 2017, 02:20 PM
Jan 2017

But organization and commitment are required, as well as the recognition by liberals that every part of the country must be talked to, and people must be convinced that voting is a necessity and non-voting or third party protest voting is a negative action on a national level.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Spokane City Council vote...