Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumSpokane City Council votes 7-0 against religious registry
The Spokane City Council chambers is filled to near capacity on January 30, 2017 as the council prepared to discuss an ordinance that would prevent city employees from complying with federal orders to create a registry of citizens based on religious beliefs. (Kip Hill / The Spokesman-Review)
MONDAY, JAN. 30, 2017, 11:05 P.M.
By Kip Hill
An impassioned crowd that spilled out of the City Council chambers Monday night mostly implored lawmakers to pass a law that would prohibit Spokane employees from assisting in the creation of a registry based on religious preference.
And the Spokane City Council did just that unanimously. To the sound of cheers and applause, the council voted 7-0 to approve an ordinance that outlaws any city employee from participating in the development of a program that requires, or has the effect of requiring, persons to register on the basis of religious affiliation, belief, or conduct.
We have many refugees, and people of different faiths, who live in our community, and they are scared, City Council President Ben Stuckart said.
Opponents accused Stuckart of grandstanding for political purposes and making a boogeyman out of President Donald Trump.
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2017/jan/30/spokane-city-council-to-ask-employees-not-to-compl/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1341 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Spokane City Council votes 7-0 against religious registry (Original Post)
rug
Jan 2017
OP
Jim__
(14,077 posts)1. It's sad that ordinances like this are considered necessary in the US.
We won't make it through 4 years of Trump.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)2. The country survived Reagan, and Nixon, and Bush.
But organization and commitment are required, as well as the recognition by liberals that every part of the country must be talked to, and people must be convinced that voting is a necessity and non-voting or third party protest voting is a negative action on a national level.
rug
(82,333 posts)3. Making the statement is often more important than the ordinance.