Religion
Related: About this forumCanadian woman turned away from U.S. border after questions about religion, Trump
'We found videos on your phone that are against us,' Fadwa Alaoui says she was told by a border agent
By Steve Rukavina, CBC News
Posted: Feb 08, 2017 12:59 PM ET
Last Updated: Feb 08, 2017 7:28 PM ET
A woman from the Montreal suburb of Brossard says she was denied entry into the U.S. Saturday after being fingerprinted, photographed and questioned in detail about her religion and her views on U.S. President Donald Trump.
Fadwa Alaoui, a Moroccan-born Canadian citizen who is Muslim and wears a hijab, says she has used her Canadian passport to enter the United States many times without incident to visit her parents and brother, who live there.
On the weekend she was travelling with two of her children and an adult cousin, who all have Canadian passports. She said they planned to spend the day shopping in Burlington, Vt., but after four hours at the border they were turned back.
She said most of the questions that she faced at the Philipsburg border crossing focused on religion.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/canadian-woman-turned-away-from-u-s-border-after-questions-about-religion-trump-1.3972019
randr
(12,412 posts)Are orders coming from above?
Whose idea was it to fly a trump flag in a military convoy?
Jim__
(14,077 posts)I would have thought that they followed a set protocol and could only refuse people entry based specific violations. I'd be surprised to learn that videos ... that are against us is one of those specific violations.
rug
(82,333 posts)The minute trump was sworn in they were shredded.
But in both cases, the Trump administrations solution is to give law enforcement agents themselves more control over how they do their jobs.
Officer-led policymaking will change law enforcement in ways that wont be immediately visible
That control might start growing the minute Trump is inaugurated or it might have started already, quietly, as the Obama administration packed up its bags. (When the people at the bottom of the organization are making the decisions, the understaffing of top levels of the executive branch isnt a problem; if anything, its a virtue.) But it wont be immediately visible to anyone but the people involved in the interaction themselves.
Border Patrol agents will have wider authority to apprehend and detain immigrants within the 100-mile zone that constitutes the US border. Theyll probably be allowed again to tag along with local law enforcement officers, as translators, and ask about the immigration status of those for whom theyre translating; theyll probably be allowed to detain more people who are trying to seek asylum or might qualify for it.
ICE agents, for their part, look to be freed of the Obama-era memos setting strict priorities for which immigrants ought to be detained and deported, and which ones ought to be released. Theyll be free to go into schools, courts, and hospitals to apprehend immigrants, if thats what they feel they need to do.
They might recover the ability to deport immigrants who currently benefit from deferred action; theyll almost certainly be able to detain and deport parents of US citizens without many questions from Washington. Theyll likely regain a new supply of immigrants from local law enforcement agencies.
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/20/14241026/police-trump-border-patrol
trump will enlist local police to join border enforcement, then move inland. This blending of agencies, with no written protocols, and subjective discretion curbed only by the ethos of those in power, is the stuff of fascism.