Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 08:53 AM Feb 2017

Canadian woman turned away from U.S. border after questions about religion, Trump

'We found videos on your phone that are against us,' Fadwa Alaoui says she was told by a border agent



By Steve Rukavina, CBC News
Posted: Feb 08, 2017 12:59 PM ET
Last Updated: Feb 08, 2017 7:28 PM ET

A woman from the Montreal suburb of Brossard says she was denied entry into the U.S. Saturday after being fingerprinted, photographed and questioned in detail about her religion and her views on U.S. President Donald Trump.

Fadwa Alaoui, a Moroccan-born Canadian citizen who is Muslim and wears a hijab, says she has used her Canadian passport to enter the United States many times without incident to visit her parents and brother, who live there.

On the weekend she was travelling with two of her children and an adult cousin, who all have Canadian passports. She said they planned to spend the day shopping in Burlington, Vt., but after four hours at the border they were turned back.

She said most of the questions that she faced at the Philipsburg border crossing focused on religion.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/canadian-woman-turned-away-from-u-s-border-after-questions-about-religion-trump-1.3972019

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Canadian woman turned away from U.S. border after questions about religion, Trump (Original Post) rug Feb 2017 OP
Are the Border Guards going rogue? randr Feb 2017 #1
Who knows? rug Feb 2017 #2
Do border agents have that type of discretionary power? Jim__ Feb 2017 #3
Apparently they do. Under Obama their discretion was delineated by memoranda and executive policy. rug Feb 2017 #4

Jim__

(14,077 posts)
3. Do border agents have that type of discretionary power?
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 12:32 PM
Feb 2017

I would have thought that they followed a set protocol and could only refuse people entry based specific violations. I'd be surprised to learn that videos ... that are against us is one of those specific violations.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
4. Apparently they do. Under Obama their discretion was delineated by memoranda and executive policy.
Thu Feb 9, 2017, 03:02 PM
Feb 2017

The minute trump was sworn in they were shredded.

The villains in the two narratives are different. On immigration, officers are being prevented from doing their jobs by dictates from above (agency management and political appointees); in criminal justice, they’re being prevented by agitators from the outside, waiting to jump on (as FBI Director James Comey once put it) the next “viral video.”

But in both cases, the Trump administration’s solution is to give law enforcement agents themselves more control over how they do their jobs.

Officer-led policymaking will change law enforcement — in ways that won’t be immediately visible

That control might start growing the minute Trump is inaugurated — or it might have started already, quietly, as the Obama administration packed up its bags. (When the people at the bottom of the organization are making the decisions, the understaffing of top levels of the executive branch isn’t a problem; if anything, it’s a virtue.) But it won’t be immediately visible to anyone but the people involved in the interaction themselves.

Border Patrol agents will have wider authority to apprehend and detain immigrants within the 100-mile zone that constitutes the US “border.” They’ll probably be allowed again to tag along with local law enforcement officers, as “translators,” and ask about the immigration status of those for whom they’re translating; they’ll probably be allowed to detain more people who are trying to seek asylum or might qualify for it.

ICE agents, for their part, look to be freed of the Obama-era memos setting strict “priorities” for which immigrants ought to be detained and deported, and which ones ought to be released. They’ll be free to go into schools, courts, and hospitals to apprehend immigrants, if that’s what they feel they need to do.

They might recover the ability to deport immigrants who currently benefit from deferred action; they’ll almost certainly be able to detain and deport parents of US citizens without many questions from Washington. They’ll likely regain a new supply of immigrants from local law enforcement agencies.

http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/20/14241026/police-trump-border-patrol

trump will enlist local police to join border enforcement, then move inland. This blending of agencies, with no written protocols, and subjective discretion curbed only by the ethos of those in power, is the stuff of fascism.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Canadian woman turned awa...