Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Fri Feb 17, 2017, 01:59 PM Feb 2017

Washington State Supreme Court rules against florist who turned away gay couple

By Sandhya Somashekhar
February 17 at 8:06 AM

In a victory for gay rights advocates, Washington’s Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against a Christian florist who was fined by the state for refusing to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding.

The justices agreed with a lower court that Barronnelle Stutzman, owner of Arlene’s Flowers in Richland, Wash., violated a state civil rights law that bars discrimination in public businesses on the basis of sexual orientation. The court also ruled that the law does not infringe on her free speech.

The case is one of several involving Christian wedding vendors that have emerged in recent years amid a dramatic expansion of gay rights. Social conservatives have argued that the legalization of same-sex marriage, and the proliferation of state and local laws barring discrimination against people on the basis of sexual orientation, have led to a trampling of religious liberties. They contend that the government should not be forcing these vendors to contribute their artistic talents to same-sex ceremonies, which they oppose on religious grounds, and that the vendors might end up having to abandon their profession to avoid violating their religious beliefs.

But as in Washington, courts have largely sided with the couples and government officials who have called their actions unlawful discrimination.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/02/17/washington-state-supreme-court-rules-against-florist-who-turned-away-gay-couple/?utm_term=.de1cf09bd3c5

http://www.adfmedia.org/files/ArlenesFlowersWSCopinion.pdf

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Washington State Supreme Court rules against florist who turned away gay couple (Original Post) rug Feb 2017 OP
K&R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t RKP5637 Feb 2017 #1
While I absolutely agree with such decisions, PoindexterOglethorpe Feb 2017 #2
They're behavior edhopper Feb 2017 #3

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,858 posts)
2. While I absolutely agree with such decisions,
Fri Feb 17, 2017, 02:03 PM
Feb 2017

I don't think I'd want to patronize any business whose owners didn't "approve" of my life style.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Washington State Supreme ...