Religion
Related: About this forumTempleton abandons pretense of rationality, awards Templeton Prize to... intelligent-design advocate
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/04/27/templeton-abandons-pretense-of-rationality-awards-templeton-prize-to-alvin-plantinga-intelligent-design-advocate/Indeed, Plantinga does believe in the Hornéd One. Heres a quote from his 2011 book, Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism, explaining why there is undeserved evil in the world (my emphasis):
But any world that contains atonement will contain sin and evil and consequent suffering and pain. Furthermore, if the remedy is to be proportionate to the sickness, such a world will contain a great deal of sin and a great deal of suffering and pain. Still further, it may very well contain sin and suffering, not just on the part of human beings but perhaps also on the part of other creatures as well. Indeed, some of these other creatures might be vastly more powerful than human beings, and some of themSatan and his minions, for examplemay have been permitted to play a role in the evolution of life on earth, steering it in the direction of predation, waste and pain. (Some may snort with disdain at this suggestion; it is none the worse for that.)
Yes it is the worse for that, for wheres the evidence for Satan? Thats some scholarly theodicy, no? And for such lucubrations, Plantinga got £1.1 millionmore than a Nobel Prizewinner.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)but the rest of it is batshit crazy.
And for that he gets a million pounds?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)http://www.templetonprize.org/purpose.html
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Did they discover something that might suggest it isn't complete bullshit? Did they find some practical use for it?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)What the criteria are, and how the nominee fits, is something that one assumes is considered by the awarding committee.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Actually, his work concerns the problem of evil as much as Creation (which is not the same as all as "Intelligent Design" .
Coyne should go back to science and give up antitheist internet blogging. That or, at a minimum, take the time to understand what he's given his life to attacking.
Bretton Garcia
(970 posts)He had some genuine interest in objective science.
But when he died? Predictably the people who took over his trust were lesser, more pious minds. Who even rewrote his mission statement, to something more familiarly "spiritual."
Somebody should sue them for violating the terms of the trust. But they are well financed.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)"Intelligent design" stands in direct opposition to legitimate scientific inquiry. When it comes down to it, this is the core conflict between religion and science: the religionist insists the universe must include their god.