Religion
Related: About this forumMexican Priest Goes to Rome to Teach Exorcism: 'Christ Was the First Exorcist'
https://pjmedia.com/faith/mexican-priest-goes-to-rome-to-teach-exorcism-jesus-was-the-first-exorcist/While many view the practice with skepticism, Truqui went to the Bible to defend it.
"Christ was the first exorcist," Truqui told The Guardian. "The power of casting out demons was one of the first signs that Christianity was a true religion."
...Truqui is correct in saying that Jesus Christ was the first known exorcist. If the New Testament is correct in recording Jesus's various miracles including numerous exorcisms the Catholic Church may represent a right way forward or at least the least wrong way forward for dealing with demons.
It's the 21st century, and people seriously still think demons not only exist, but can possess people. The largest Christian church on the planet OFFICIALLY TEACHES IT.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,706 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Iggo
(47,554 posts)Fucking ridiculous.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)When you pin all the good stuff on the almighty someone has to take the rap for all the bad stuff. Dog knows the devil has his hands full with all the fornication.
Iggo
(47,554 posts)It's the belief in demonic possession by actual educated grownups that's ridiculous.
All day I have to convince myself** that these people aren't stupid.
(**LOL...maybe that's how they do it. )
struggle4progress
(118,285 posts)as if they are gripped somehow by gigantic evil forces
British serial killer Harold Shipman, who worked in England as a medical doctor, killed over 200 of his patients before his arrest in 1998
And the underlying defect is not always intellectual, so a rational appeal is not guaranteed to address the problem.
Psychological treatment of a patient may depend heavily on individual history and personality and may require adopting a world-view that makes sense to the patient and has the potential to disrupt and reorganize existing thought patterns: the proper test is not that the approach makes sense to outsiders but rather that progress occurs. This fact may account for the variety of treatment approaches available
Voltaire2
(13,041 posts)Such a suggestion, it it were true, would entirely exonerate them from guilt for their actions.
struggle4progress
(118,285 posts)that "forces" (external to individuals) played important roles: such "forces" include cultural mythologies, socio-economic contexts, and (later) ideologically-controlled mass media
People often choose who or what they allow to control them
They, of course, remain morally responsible for what they do and for what they choose not to do, depending (however) on what they actually know, what they should know but decide not to examine, or what they cannot possibly know --- which (for a nation of (say) 65 million people) might vary considerably from individual to individual
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)Another low is reached.
Voltaire2
(13,041 posts)People ought to think just a little bit how their posts might be perceived before hitting send, especially if they are following the unwritten rule here that no defense of theism is ever wrong.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)While also asking why no discussion is going on.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)With all the glossolalia he should be able to drum up quite a business. If he can just drive out the snake charming he'd probably save quite a few from death and serious injury.
MineralMan
(146,314 posts)More supernatural entities to reject, it seems to me. Gods, angels, demons, devils, ghosts, spirits...all bogus, non-existent figments of the human imagination.