Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:13 AM May 2012

Whose Blasphemy? The Atheist Case for 'Religious Freedom'

May 24, 2012
By Austin Dacey

It is hard to imagine a less hateful person than Alexander Aan. Mild and soft-spoken, the 30-year-old Indonesian bureaucrat recently told Al Jazeera, in an interview conducted just outside his jail cell, “As a democracy and part of the global community, because we are not isolated from the outside world, I think we should be more tolerant. Nobody hurts anyone simply because he has different ideas.” And yet Aan is facing up to 11 years in prison for blasphemy and inciting religious hatred because he voiced his skepticism about Islam on Facebook.

In the West, the paradigms of blasphemy are fair-haired Danish cartoonists drawing the Prophet and Richard Dawkins badmouthing Yahweh. The public debate is about how to balance freedom of speech with respect for religious belief. But Alexander Aan’s case, playing out in the world’s most populous Muslim country, represents a much different global reality. Here the value at stake is not just freedom of speech, but freedom of conscience. The real contest is not between atheists and believers, but between those who affirm the equality of all persons of conscience and those who deny it.

Aan was arrested in a small town in West Sumatra on January 18 after a number of local residents assaulted him at work in an act of self-styled vigilantism. They were reacting to some of his postings on a Facebook page devoted to atheism: a note entitled “the Prophet Muhammad was attracted to his own daughter-in-law”; a comic suggesting the Prophet slept with his wife's maid; and a status update reading, “If you believe in god, then please show him to me.”

Prosecutors have charged Aan under the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, which prohibits inciting hatred or enmity of a religious group, and under the country’s blasphemy provision, Article 156a, which criminalizes “hostility, hatred or contempt” and “disgracing” of a religion. Article 156a also prohibits attempts to persuade others to leave their religion and embrace atheism.

http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/atheologies/6012/whose_blasphemy_the_atheist_case_for_religious_freedom/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
1. The words of the complaint against Aan are very familiar here.
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:23 AM
May 2012

I wonder how far the intent of the various authors differs.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
3. It's scary how similar.
Fri May 25, 2012, 10:02 AM
May 2012

"hostility, hatred or contempt"

Almost as if some DUers agree with the fundamentalists that blasphemy must be prevented and/or punished.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
7. Yep, that's how a lot of people label "disagreement" unfortunately.
Fri May 25, 2012, 11:59 AM
May 2012

In an attempt to shame, scold, or otherwise punish the heretics.

Like I said, the similarities are striking...

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
8. So, do you say it's disagreement with religious beliefs and people in the Group
Fri May 25, 2012, 12:22 PM
May 2012

and not "hostility, hatred or contempt"?

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
12. The OP talked of religious freedom
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:16 PM
May 2012

I stated that churches do not believe in religious freedoms for other religions

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
13. The article is about Islam and there are religions that believe strongly
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:19 PM
May 2012

in religious freedoms for other religions.

But blanket statements are easy.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
10. Really good article and persuasive argument.
Fri May 25, 2012, 01:40 PM
May 2012

I don't think we can even imagine what it is like to live with these kinds of laws.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Whose Blasphemy? The Athe...