Religion
Related: About this forumDoes Analytic Thinking Erode Religious Belief?
http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/science/5991/does_analytic_thinking_erode_religious_beliefGreat article. This is why I mostly reject the findings of these soft sciences.
May 29, 2012Does Analytic Thinking Erode Religious Belief? By ANDREW AGHAPOUR
I have some secrets for you; feel free to tell everyone. Psychopaths have distinct types of brains, and so do left-handed people. Bar Mitzvahs aid myelination, the conversion of gray-matter neurons into white-matter neurons. Bragging makes us feel really good, which is why Facebook is better than sex. If that concerns you, dont worry, because the pharmaceutical industry is going to save marriage. Shakespeare tickles the visual association cortex. Dopamine makes us do bad things, but meditation makes your brain quicker. Bloody Mary (the apparition, not the drink) is probably a facial recognition error. Babies are a little bit racist.
Like the zombies that populate our screens, Americans have an immense appetite for brains. Most of the above stories come from just the past month, and they are only a small sample of neurosciences prominent circulation in the news cycle. Neuroscience can tell us who we are, how we can improve ourselves, and why other people act in the strange ways that they do. In an increasingly complex world, brains seem to somehow point back to the one thing that all humans have in common.
Perhaps because of the high demand for news about the brain, media coverage of neuroscience is notoriously sketchy. In a recent article in the journal Neuron, the authors lament the ways that popular neuroscience is used to artificially underline differences between categories of people in ways that [are] symbolically layered and socially loaded. In other words, research about the brain is often stretched and extended to support existing stereotypes about race, sex, class, and religion. Neuroscience is new enough, and our desire for brain facts is strong enough, that dubious claims about brain types circulate widely.
A Trio of Wacky Experiments
Take, for example, the latest Neuroscience-of-Religion news item to make the rounds, this one claiming that critical thinking undermines religious belief. Based on two studies from The Journal of Experimental Psychologies and Science, it has been picked up by The Atlantic, The Huffington Post, and (unsurprisingly) RichardDawkins.net.
more at link
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)struggle4progress
(118,290 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)struggle4progress
(118,290 posts)Democrats_win
(6,539 posts)This article defends intuition but forgets that intuition can be flat wrong and we'll never know unless someone does a lot of analytical work. You know, the hard work that Bush complained about but never did before he got us into that frickin war.
Sometimes intuition is important; sometimes relying on it is harmful. Rememeber smoking cigarettes? It took decades of analytical work to prove what everyone intuitively knew: it kills.
Why is it that intuition props up the bad things but can never be used for good? No one wants to do the hard analytical work. We're lazy.
Ironically, it's intuition that tells us analytical thinking erodes religious belief. And now someone is doing the analytical work. It may be off to a rough start but we know they'll get it right eventually. This article has some good criticism of the method but some of this article isn't right. Which makes me wonder if religion erodes a persons ability for analytical thought or his willingness to take on analytical work. You know, like Bush.