Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 09:58 AM Jan 2019

South Carolina foster care providers can reject based on religion

https://www.channel3000.com/news/politics/national-politics/south-carolina-foster-care-providers-can-reject-based-on-religion/987528616

Federally funded child welfare agencies in South Carolina can refuse to perform services that conflict with their religious beliefs, the US Department of Health and Human Services said Wednesday.

The announcement came in response to Gov. Henry McMaster's request for a waiver for faith-based groups that contract with the state for foster care services, such as child placements and screenings of prospective families.

Citing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, McMaster requested an exemption from federal regulations enacted by the Obama administration that forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity and religion -- among other identities -- in HHS programs and services.

...Miracle Hill made headlines in 2018 when it turned away a Jewish woman, who sought to mentor children in foster care, because she did not share the organization's religious beliefs.


Religious privilege in action.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
2. They are certainly Christian according to their definition.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 10:46 AM
Jan 2019

And considering there are self-identified Christians on DU who have vastly different beliefs, who is to say they aren't?

MineralMan

(146,318 posts)
3. Yes. If someone claims to be a Christian, who am I to naysay.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 10:50 AM
Jan 2019

If that person turns out to be an asshole, then i will point out that the person is a self-defined Christian asshole. Or, I might use sarcasm to make the same point.

As a non-Christian, I have no choice but to accept people's own labels as Christians. However, I can use various adjectives to describe them, I think.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
6. Oh absolutely.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 11:02 AM
Jan 2019

We have a prominent DUer right in this forum who purports to follow the message of Jesus, but also freely judges others and dispenses "eye for an eye" justice. Two things Jesus specifically told his followers NOT to do.

MineralMan

(146,318 posts)
7. Yes. Of late, though, that DUer appears to be taking up the cause of Islam.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 11:05 AM
Jan 2019

It reminds me of part of the lyrics of a brief song that was added at the end of side 2 of an old Beatles album.

Her Majesty's a pretty nice girl,
But she changes from day to day - bum bum bum...

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
10. Funny you should mention the Beatles...
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 12:43 PM
Jan 2019

...because this fascination with Islam seems to resemble the Beatles' selfsame saccharine, bored, middle-class flirtation with Hinduism.

MineralMan

(146,318 posts)
13. Now that you mention it, it does, indeed.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 05:04 PM
Jan 2019

And slowly, but surely, the movement is away from religion and toward non-religion. Catholicism, Christianity, Theism, Deism, Agnosticism, and finally Atheism. The progression is not an uncommon one.

Progress.

Mariana

(14,858 posts)
12. "Self-defined Christian" is a redundant phrase.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 04:19 PM
Jan 2019

All Christians are self-defined. It is sufficient, I think, to say that such a person is a Christian asshole.

Act_of_Reparation

(9,116 posts)
4. Religious fascination with adoption is rarely just about the welfare of the children.
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 10:51 AM
Jan 2019

It's also about winning converts.

MineralMan

(146,318 posts)
5. Yes, that's very true. Indoctrination of children is an important
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 10:52 AM
Jan 2019

aspect of ensuring the continued existence of religions.

NeoGreen

(4,031 posts)
8. Yep...
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 11:25 AM
Jan 2019

...
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/after-95-years-ny-rules-end-catholic-adoption-and-foster-services-in-buffalo-60894




After 95 years, NY rules end Catholic adoption and foster services in Buffalo
Buffalo, N.Y., Aug 27, 2018 / 04:01 am (CNA/EWTN News).- Adoption and foster services through Catholic Charities of Buffalo are ending because state rules do not allow the agency to maintain its practice of only placing children in homes with a mother and a father.

“Because Catholic Charities cannot simultaneously comply with state regulations and conform to the teaching of the Catholic Church on the nature of marriage, Catholic Charities will discontinue foster care and adoption services,” Catholic Charities of Buffalo said Aug. 23.

The Catholic Charities affiliate said it cannot follow state requirements that require contracting agencies to allow same-sex couples to foster and adopt children. It cited Catholic teaching recognizing marriage as a union of a woman and a man.


"If we can't enforce our (hateful) doctrine, then we'll take our toys and go home."

I.e. It was never about the children.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
11. Republicans are always looking for ways to funnel taxpayer money to religious organizations
Thu Jan 24, 2019, 01:03 PM
Jan 2019

...and as we see time and time again, they will use that money to discriminate against those who do not believe as they do.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»South Carolina foster car...