Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 08:16 PM Jun 2012

Let's Hear It For Catholic Leaders Who Defend Marriage Equality!

Posted: 06/18/2012 4:35 pm
Bernard Schlager, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Center for Lesbian and Gay Studies in Religion and Ministry, Pacific School of Religion

Last month -- just a week before the president announced his support for marriage equality -- I had the privilege of hearing Governors Chris Gregoire of Washington and Martin O'Malley of Maryland speak (at the Human Rights Campaign [HRC] offices in Washington DC) about their hard-fought battles to secure marriage equality in their respective states. To listen to these two Catholic politicians eloquently and passionately defend the right of same-sex couples to get married in the eyes of the state was a wonderfully refreshing and genuinely empowering experience. And it made me proud to be Catholic especially at a time when many American bishops are ratcheting up -- in truly unprecedented ways -- their divisive and un-Christian attacks on queer people.

What should we make of the fact that five Catholic governors have come out in support of marriage equality? To date -- in addition to Gregoire and O'Malley -- former Governor John Baldacci of Maine, Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, and Governor John Lynch of New Hampshire have all worked to extend the civil right of marriage to their lesbian and gay constituents and all of them are practicing Catholics.

With the news full of stories about Catholic bishops lining up (and often coughing up millions of dollars) to deny marriage equality to same-sex couples, it is indeed remarkable to see these five governors do the right thing and advance significantly one of the most important social justice movements in our country today. And their actions find firm theological support (surprising to many) in the rich Catholic tradition of social justice which is rooted in centuries-old church teachings on the dignity of the human person and the duty of the individual to follow her/his conscience in all matters (see, for instance, The Second Vatican Council's Declaration on Religious Freedom [1965]: §2 and §3).

Perhaps the most eloquent explanations of how her Catholic faith played an important role in her decision to defend marriage equality comes from Governor Gregoire who had initially opposed, on religious grounds, civil marriage for lesbian and gay couples. Speaking in a television interview on Seattle's KING Channel 5 on 4 Jan. 2012, the governor related how she had been hesitant to support marriage equality, in large part, because of her Catholic faith. It was in talking with her own daughters, however, that she began to understand that marriage equality was a civil rights issue similar in some ways to the Civil Rights movements of the 1960s which she had supported passionately as a child. After talking with a priest friend who supported her change of heart on the matter and after entering into respectful dialogue with her local bishop (who did not support marriage equality), Gregoire made the bold and faith-filled decision that she could not in good conscience deny the right of civil marriage to lesbian and gay couples in her state. Moreover, it was as a person of faith, as a Catholic, that she realized that she had a moral obligation to support marriage equality.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bernard-schlager-phd/lets-hear-it-for-catholic_b_1590242.html

Not to mention Joe Biden who, inadvertently or not, gave a well-timed kick in the ass.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let's Hear It For Catholic Leaders Who Defend Marriage Equality! (Original Post) rug Jun 2012 OP
Good for them. It must take courage to stand up to the leadership of their religion. laconicsax Jun 2012 #1
Oh, you mean American political leaders that happen to be Catholic. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #2
No, I mean the headline that came with the article. rug Jun 2012 #3
I mean that they are not part of the leadership of the Catholic church. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #4
No, but they are members in good standing with the Catholic Church and they are civil leaders. rug Jun 2012 #5
Their enabling of this process is in contradiction to the position of the Pope. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #6
And they are astute enough to see he is speaking beyond his competence. rug Jun 2012 #7
Of course they are diverse. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #8
You have no way of knowing why they did this. rug Jun 2012 #9
Nope, I don't. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #10
Outside your mind, this thread is about U.S. Catholic politicians who have done the right thing. rug Jun 2012 #11
It's also about Democrats that have done the right thing. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #12
Ah, they're in favor of marriage equality because they wear shoes. rug Jun 2012 #13
Oh, so, wait, YOU know why they are in favor of marriage equality? n/t Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #14
I know it's not about wearing shoes. rug Jun 2012 #15
It's not trivializing Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #16
Of course it is. rug Jun 2012 #17
I think what they have done it great. I wish more would do so. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #19
It will be more fruitful to leave this at your headline. rug Jun 2012 #20
I think it should be the article headline. Goblinmonger Jun 2012 #21
Leaves out the Catholic stuff AlbertCat Jun 2012 #22
Good for them. Kudos for taking a stand here. cbayer Jun 2012 #18
 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
1. Good for them. It must take courage to stand up to the leadership of their religion.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 08:53 PM
Jun 2012

(I'm not sure I'd call them "Catholic Leaders" since they aren't leaders of Catholicism, but that really isn't important.)

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
2. Oh, you mean American political leaders that happen to be Catholic.
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 11:43 PM
Jun 2012

I thought it was actually the Catholic leadership.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
3. No, I mean the headline that came with the article.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 12:46 AM
Jun 2012

And do you think they just happen to be Catholic or that it's a conscious choice?

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
4. I mean that they are not part of the leadership of the Catholic church.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:19 AM
Jun 2012

The headline is unclear. That was my whole point.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
5. No, but they are members in good standing with the Catholic Church and they are civil leaders.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:24 AM
Jun 2012

Marriage equality is a civil issue and these Catholic Democrats found no impediment to doing the right thing. You might even say they enabled this progress.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
6. Their enabling of this process is in contradiction to the position of the Pope.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:26 AM
Jun 2012

So I wouldn't say they did this because they were Catholic. They have been taught as Catholics, by this and prior Popes, that gay marriage is wrong. And if they have similar liberal stances about abortion, they may not be Catholics in good standing depending on the bishop you listen to.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
7. And they are astute enough to see he is speaking beyond his competence.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:34 AM
Jun 2012

As to why they have taken this position, I would not presume to catalog their motives beyond noting the strong component of social justice, inter alia, of Catholic tradition. Catholics are diverse and are not unthinking sheep.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
8. Of course they are diverse.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:39 AM
Jun 2012

Which means that their church didn't make them do this. They did this because they are good people. In my mind, that they did this in opposition to the teaching of the hierarchy makes it pretty clear that they didn't do this because they were Catholic.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
10. Nope, I don't.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:56 AM
Jun 2012

That's why I used the phrase, "in my mind." What I do know is that the hierarchy of the RCC has never had the position these people are taking. In fact, the last two popes have been very outspoken AGAINST gay marriage calling it the biggest threat to humanity (or something like that). I KNOW they didn't get their stance on gay marriage from the hierarchy/leadership of their church.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
11. Outside your mind, this thread is about U.S. Catholic politicians who have done the right thing.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 10:59 AM
Jun 2012
 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
12. It's also about Democrats that have done the right thing.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:03 AM
Jun 2012

And people with hair.
And people with two arms.
And people that wear shoes.
And people that drink water.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
16. It's not trivializing
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:23 AM
Jun 2012

It is making a statement about causality. If we don't know why they did it, then we no more know it is because of their shoes than their religion. Unless you are now changing your position to state that we DO know why they did it and it is because of their religion.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
17. Of course it is.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:28 AM
Jun 2012

Rather than applaud the work these politicians have done, you choose to construct a screed about the Catholic Church and assert, without evidence, that their action is extraneous to their principles, including their religious principles. Humans do not act in a vacuum. I suppose the shoe is just a gratutous detail.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
19. I think what they have done it great. I wish more would do so.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:42 AM
Jun 2012

But you are the one that said we can't know why they did it. I agreed. You, though, continue to put the Catholic label on them when talking about the great things they have done. I have pointed out that if we don't know why they did it, it could be anything.

And how do I make the assertion without evidence.? I said that the stance they take is in direct contrast to, at least, the last two popes. Do I really need to provide the link to where JPII and Ratzy have said that?

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
21. I think it should be the article headline.
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 11:45 AM
Jun 2012

Leaves out the Catholic stuff which, we both agree, we have no reason to know if it is a cause for their actions.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
22. Leaves out the Catholic stuff
Tue Jun 19, 2012, 04:51 PM
Jun 2012

I agree.

Indeed, the "Catholic stuff" is only mentioned because it GOES AGAINST what a "good Catholic" should do.... oppose church doctrine.

They did it because they see what is "right", not because they are Catholic, and in spite of being Catholic. Why should some religion get credit for this? It's like giving credit to Catholicism for opposing Catholicism. It's disingenuous and dumb.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Let's Hear It For Catholi...