Religion
Related: About this forumRomney: Releasing tax returns would violate my religious privacy
Posted at 11:26 AM ET, 08/24/2012
TheWashingtonPost
A number of people are pointing to Mitt Romneys latest excuse for not releasing his tax returns, which is that it would violate his religious privacy:
Our church doesnt publish how much people have given, Romney tells Parade magazine in an edition due out Sunday. This is done entirely privately. One of the downsides of releasing ones financial information is that this is now all public, but we had never intended our contributions to be known. Its a very personal thing between ourselves and our commitment to our God and to our church.
There are a number of problems with this explanation. For instance, as Steve Benen notes, we already know how much hes given to the Mormon church in at least one year, the one for which he did make his returns available. Alex Seitz Wald, meanwhile, points out that this didnt stop Romneys father from releasing a dozen years of tax returns, which detailed how much hed given to the church.
Id add one more point here: One of those calling on Romney to release his returns happens to be ... a very prominent Mormon. As you may recall, Jon Huntsman Sr., a longtime Romney backer and fundraiser, has publicly told Romney that he needs to release his returns in order to be square with the American people.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/romney-releasing-tax-returns-would-violate-my-religious-privacy/2012/08/24/333ec2d0-edfc-11e1-afd8-097e90f99d05_blog.html
Imbecile.
MichiganVote
(21,086 posts)Nobody needs to be a Democrat to recognize when someone is doing a con job. This guy is really just full of BS.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)What you plan to do with this country is a very personnel thing between you and me. So I demand to see your tax returns so I can see how you really feel about this country.
Thank You
Angry Dragon
Ezlivin
(8,153 posts)That's going to come in useful in the future.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)(a) Don't take that contribution as a tax deduction OR
(b) Don't run for President of the U.S.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)nothing to dispel that.
rug
(82,333 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)dimbear
(6,271 posts)I won't post the link again, but the booklet I reference is at least popular on his site.
Ilsa
(61,697 posts)of the charitable contributions. Yes, the total can be figured out, but unless he's cheap with charity, it shouldn't be a problem. Or redact another deduction with it.