Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 12:59 PM Dec 2012

'Mixed Religion' as Identity: Who Are These People?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/susan-katz-miller/mixed-religion-as-identity-who-are-these-people_b_2294159.html

Susan Katz Miller
Author, interfaith blogger: On Being Both
Posted: 12/13/2012 1:25 pm

This week, we learned of 23,000 people in England and Wales classified as having "Mixed Religion." This news comes from the United Kingdom's Office on National Statistics, which just released new numbers on religious identity from the 2011 government census. Most of the news reports have focused on the finding that from 2001 to 2011, the percentage of Christians in England and Wales fell from 72 percent to 59 percent. Meanwhile, the number claiming no religion almost doubled to 25 percent, paralleling the rise of the "religious nones" in the U.S. The numbers of Muslims grew most quickly, to almost 5 percent, and the percentage of Hindus, Sikhs and Pagans all increased as well.

But as someone who was born into an interfaith family and raised my children with two religions, my eye was drawn to the new evidence of people claiming more than one religion in their lives. Who are these "Mixed Religion" folks? How many of them are born Christians or Jews who find Paganism or Buddhism equally compelling? How many of them are in long-term relationships and find themselves practicing their spouse or partner's religion as well as their own? And how many of them are adults raised with more than one religion in interfaith families?

Here in the United States, the government's Bureau of the Census collected information on identity from religious organizations from 1906 to 1936, but then stopped. As a matter of separation of church and state, I understand that we do not want to ask about religious identity on the Census. The question about religion was added to the U.K. Census in 2001. Answering the religion question on the Census is optional, but only about 7 percent declined to answer.

For statistics on religious identity in America, the best source may be the Pew Forum's U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. In the 2009 report "Many Americans Mix Multiple Faiths," Pew researchers found that, even beyond weddings and funerals, almost a quarter of Americans sometimes attend services of a faith other than "their own." But the Pew researchers did not directly address the idea of "Mixed Religion" as a primary identity.

more at link
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

dchill

(38,532 posts)
1. Let's not forget those who mix religion...
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:04 PM
Dec 2012

with stupidity. Or megalomania. Those are HUGE memberships.

dchill

(38,532 posts)
3. I feel you're banging your head at my reply.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:33 PM
Dec 2012

I'm banging my head at the utter mootness and vapidity of the article.


cbayer

(146,218 posts)
6. Sometimes they do. Ask the author (and many other who live in households
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 01:50 PM
Dec 2012

with mixed religion).

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
8. Whatever floats your boat.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:12 PM
Dec 2012

I'll stand on mine. Individuals are entitled to embrace or not embrace any religions they want to.

I take it you have a rather fundamentalist approach towards religion. Are there other areas as well?

dchill

(38,532 posts)
9. I am not religious at all.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:26 PM
Dec 2012

I merely observe religion from a careful distance - when possible. Philosophies may be mixed, but not religions.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
10. One does not need to be religious to be a fundamentalist.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:29 PM
Dec 2012

If you are not religious, how can take such a position, unless you are a fundamentalist?

It's like a straight person saying there is no such thing as bisexuality.

dchill

(38,532 posts)
11. Yeah, that's me - Mr. Fundy.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:37 PM
Dec 2012

I'm even wishy-washy about agnosticism. And your comparison is fairly insulting - as well as logically bereft.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
12. Your premise is insulting to all those that embrace several ways of seeing the
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:40 PM
Dec 2012

world,

and also logically bereft.

Ah, and dogma as well, the hallmark of fundamentalism.

dchill

(38,532 posts)
13. Who's really got the dogma here?
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 02:51 PM
Dec 2012

Religion is fundamentalist. The more religious, the more fundamentalist. I'm talking about religion, you're talking about personal philosophy. Believe me, they are not the same.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
14. Religion is not all fundamentalist.
Fri Dec 14, 2012, 03:17 PM
Dec 2012

Perhaps it has been in your experience, but that speaks only to your experience.

I clearly understand the difference between philosophy and religion.

What's dogmatic is preaching something as an absolute truth when it is only an opinion.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»'Mixed Religion' as Ident...