Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forum6 ways politicians can win the atheist vote
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/6_ways_politicians_can_win_the_atheist_vote/WEDNESDAY, DEC 26, 2012 07:34 AM PST
There are as many nonreligious Americans as evangelicals -- so why does no one take this voting bloc seriously?
BY ADAM LEE, ALTERNET
A billboard erected by atheists in Oklahoma City. (Credit: AP/Sue Ogrocki)
In the aftermath of President Obamas electoral romp over Mitt Romney, the media and pundits have paid much attention to the demographics that propelled him to victory, especially women, Hispanics and young voters. But theres one more group that played an underappreciated yet crucial role in his reelection, and which only now is starting to get the recognition it deserves.
A growing segment of American society up to 20%, according to recent surveys, and higher than that in younger generations is what pollsters call the nones, people who answer None of the above to questions about religious affiliation. This includes declared atheists and agnostics, as well as people who choose not to identify with any organized religion. In many swing states like Ohio, Florida and Virginia, President Obama lost both Protestants and Catholics by relatively small margins, but won nonreligious voters by huge margins, enough to put him over the top. In the country at large, there are now as many nonreligious people as there are evangelical Christians.
But the political loyalties of this group cant be taken for granted. For example, despite his dependency on unaffiliated voters, President Obama has broken a campaign promise by continuing to fund and promote George W. Bushs faith-based initiative, which funnels federal money to religious charities that discriminate in hiring. In effect, nonbelieving taxpayers are being forced to subsidize jobs they could never be hired for.
In this cycle, the specter of a Romney presidency indebted to the religious right persuaded nonreligious voters to choose the lesser of two evils. But theres no guarantee that this will happen in every future election. If Democrats continue to antagonize atheists and other nones, they may just stay home, and thats a prospect politicians shouldnt take lightly. As the Republicans become increasingly ideologically purified, Democratic candidates will need, more than ever before, for their base to turn out in big numbers, and that includes the nonreligious. Anything that turns them off, that dampens their enthusiasm or discourages them from showing up, could mean the difference in a close race.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 874 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
6 ways politicians can win the atheist vote (Original Post)
cbayer
Dec 2012
OP
Warpy
(111,273 posts)1. #1 is totally unnecessary.
Most of us would love it if no politician felt it necessary to wear his religious affiliation--or lack of it--on his sleeve. It's irrelevant.
The other 5 are necessary, but that's because they're necessary to being a good Democrat. Since we unaffiliated folks overwhelmingly vote Democratic, that's important.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)2. But since that isn't going to happen anytime soon, I think more exposure and openness
could definitely help the cause of decreasing the bigotry towards atheists.
It's like not being able to justify any prejudice once you know people from a group you were bigoted against.
Some believe that Stark's atheism was used against him in the latest campaign and the fact that Sinema's campaign disavowed her atheism is troubling.
I look forward to the day when it has no bearing, though.