Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 05:51 PM Feb 2013

Ohio town latest focus of religion legal debate

http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Ohio-town-latest-focus-of-religion-legal-debate-4275065.php

By DAN SEWELL, Associated Press | February 13, 2013 | Updated: February 13, 2013 2:53pm


Attendees recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" before the start of a Jackson City Schools board meeting where the board was to decide on whether to fight a federal lawsuit contending that a portrait of Jesus hanging in the school building where it's been for 65 years unconstitutionally promotes religion in a public school, Tuesday, Feb. 12, 2013, in Jackson, Ohio. The board voted 4-0 to keep the painting, saying it is protecting students' free speech rights. Photo: The Columbus Dispatch, Doral Chenoweth

JACKSON, Ohio (AP) — Since just after World War II, a portrait of Jesus has hung in a Jackson City Schools building, attracting little discussion and no controversy that anyone seems to recall.

But that changed recently after a complaint, and this small city in mostly rural Appalachian Ohio has now found itself as the latest battleground in a national debate over what displays of religion are constitutional.

Facing a federal lawsuit charging that the middle school portrait illegally promotes religion in a public school, school officials dug in their heels Tuesday night at a board meeting. They declared that the portrait belongs to the Christian-based student club that presented it in 1947 and is part of a "limited public forum" in which other student groups can hang portraits of "inspirational figures central to the club's meaning and purpose." Taking it down would censor students' private speech, it said.

"It's a delicate balance for us as a district," Superintendent Phil Howard said, adding that he thought the board's action protected students' rights while making clear it wasn't endorsing a religion.

more at link
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ohio town latest focus of religion legal debate (Original Post) cbayer Feb 2013 OP
I'm delighted that the Board is going to fight it. COLGATE4 Feb 2013 #1
Why would anyone imagine that a portrait of Jesus endorsed a particular religion? dimbear Feb 2013 #2
I would love to see what the people would do/say if they showed up and found Tyrs WolfDaemon Feb 2013 #3

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
1. I'm delighted that the Board is going to fight it.
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 07:45 PM
Feb 2013

This way the Goobers will run up huge legal bills before being handed their ass by a Federal Court. a real "win win" for those of us who believe in the separation of church and state.

dimbear

(6,271 posts)
2. Why would anyone imagine that a portrait of Jesus endorsed a particular religion?
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 08:22 PM
Feb 2013

Everyone is free to worship Him in any way he pleases.

(tip of the hat to Eric Cartman)

Tyrs WolfDaemon

(2,289 posts)
3. I would love to see what the people would do/say if they showed up and found
Wed Feb 13, 2013, 10:33 PM
Feb 2013

That Jesus was joined by portraits of other gods from around the world. A 'mythology' club could sponsor it and even rotate through them with the appropriate gods for the time of year (for example Venus/Aphrodite/Freya would be good right now for Valentine's day).


Just a thought.


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Ohio town latest focus of...