Religion
Related: About this forumReligion and premarital sex
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/brainiac/2013/02/religion_and_pr.htmlPosted by Kevin Hartnett February 15, 2013 11:53 AM
Water rolls down hill. Sex happens. But a recent study in the American Sociological Review reveals that even in this globalized, secular age, the religion you belong to still has major effects on how likely you are to have taken a turn in bed before marriage.
The paper, Religion and Sexual Behaviors, was written by Amy Adamczyk and Brittany Hayes of the City University of New York. They were particularly interested in determining whether Muslims were less likely to have engaged in premarital sex than adherents of other major religions.
To answer that question the sociologists examined survey data of 418,000 people in developing countries. They found that, true to Islams conservative reputation, Muslims were the least likely of all major religious groups to have had sex before marriage:
Sex is a notoriously difficult subject to study. There are all sorts of reasons people dissemble about what they do, and you can imagine those incentives are even stronger when youre a woman in a conservative Muslim household being asked whether you had sex before marrying your husband. Aware of these challenges, the researchers ran several statistical tests to assess respondents truthfulness. They found that Muslims and Hindus were actually the least likely of all religious groups to fib about premarital sex. This could suggest that Muslims and Hindus have fewer transgressions to lie about; or it could mean that Muslims and Hindus are better dissemblers given the heightened consequences around premarital sex in those cultures.
more at link
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Freddie
(9,267 posts)Who wants to have sex with a guy you don't know, before or after marriage?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I have seen some that worked, and some that didn't.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)I could help you find it.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)that offered it, I would appreciate the information.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)just a cartoon.
Cheerful is good nowadays. That little boat makes me smile.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)I live on a single masted sloop, but just couldn't find a gif I like better than this one.
Smooth sailing to you, ladjf!
Bay Boy
(1,689 posts)...what does 'traditional' refer to?
goldent
(1,582 posts)The article didn't say.
I can only imagine people who aren't religious, but are missing having religion in their lives.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)find a good definition, but my guess (based on what they do say there) is that they mean religions that are more indigenous and don't fall into the categories of the world's major religions.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)about the rates of pre-marital sex is to look at birth certificates.
Babies born less than 7 months after the wedding are almost always (rare exceptions for premies) the result of pre-marital sex.
Of course, this measure does not capture those who had sex before marriage but she didn't get pregnant.
I recall some years ago someone did that analysis of birth certificates/parents' marriage date in Puritan New England, and oh, my the rates of pre-marital sex were incredibly high.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)at reliability. Much of it is over my head, though.