Religion
Related: About this forumFaith in Values: Partners for LGBT Equality
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/religion/news/2013/07/10/69128/partners-for-lgbt-equality/SOURCE: AP/Jae C. Hong
City officials performing same-sex marriages are sworn in before conducting wedding ceremonies in West Hollywood, California, Monday, July 1, 2013.
By Sally Steenland | July 10, 2013
Church bells rang out across the country two weeks ago today to celebrate the Supreme Court decisions supporting marriage equality. From St. Johns Episcopal Church across the square from the White House to St. Pauls Cathedral in San Diego, many houses of worship marked the June 26 rulings with a joyful noise.
The ringing bells were a vivid reminder that religious communities have been crucial in the fight for freedom, equality, and justice for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender, or LGBT, Americans. Despite the conventional notion that religion is inherently opposed to LGBT equality, the truth is that clergy and people in the pews have long been working both under the radar and publicly for LGBT equality.
People of faith, for instance, have connected with scholars to develop solid theologies that support LGBT moral equality. They have created support and advocacy networks in virtually every denomination, pressured religious opponents to repudiate hateful and dehumanizing language against LGBT people, and sponsored honest conversations within their houses of worship. Beyond that, people of faith have also created messaging and outreach that acknowledges the different places religious people are on the journey toward LGBT acceptance. This messaging acknowledges conflicts of conscience and points the way toward celebrating LGBT equality, not in spite of, but because of ones faith.
While faith communities were doing this internal work, LGBT advocacy groups came to realize their importance as allies. After all, when right-wing opponents compare you to murderers, rapists, and thieves, and claim that you are an abomination, it makes sense to have religious partners who can rebut such hateful rhetoric and proclaim a very different messageone of love, compassion, and inclusivity. But beyond making good strategic sense, collaborating with faith allies came about in part because many LGBT advocates are quietly people of faith. With religious partners promoting moral equality, LGBT advocates could come out as people of faith and wage the battle with their wholepolitical and spiritualselves.
more at link
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)"Religious communities" have been the primary, overwhelming force against LGBT equality in this country. If there were no religious communities, this issue would never have been one that needed to be fought over for so long.
People of faith, for instance, have connected with scholars to develop solid theologies that support LGBT moral equality.
"Solid theologies"?? WTF does that even mean? How about, "All people should have the same rights, and if my religion says otherwise, it's wrong"? Someone seriously needed to be a scholar to come up with that?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)It's whatever silly rationalization you can come up with to justify your personal religious beliefs and then feel real good about it, silly.
It's altering your long and deeply-held religious beliefs in the direction of whatever socio-political winds are blowing in order to try and remain relevant and privileged.
Serious Theologians only, please.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)making religion as it's written seem palatable, humane and rational, and convincing people that it's Ok to believe in.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)It's altering your long and deeply-held religious beliefs in the direction of whatever socio-political winds are blowing in order to try and remain relevant and privileged, and convince yourself that your religion was right all along.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)skepticscott
(13,029 posts)that "solid theology" is an argument that reassures you that the Bible says what you were already convinced it should say, and means what you were already convinced it should mean.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Great post!
trotsky
(49,533 posts)We are expected to lavish praise upon the faith communities that are finally doing the right thing - while simultaneously ignoring the fact that the religious beliefs of faith communities who opposed progress for so long had something to do with the problem in the first place. Religion gets full credit when it does something good, but none of the blame when it does something bad.
Pointing this out gets you branded an evil militant fundie atheist bigot, and shunned.
okasha
(11,573 posts)but that crunching noise you hear is knees hitting teeth for seven posts solid.
The last few years have seen the emergence of a rapidly-growing consensus among non-fundamentalists that LGBT rights are human rights, and that equality under the law benefits everyone, including majority populations. Pagans have been there for a loooong time--millenia for some--but it's encouraging to have more and more company as the barriers fall.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)One of our daughter's friends is working for them and I think they are doing some really good stuff.
Their articles are tightly written and provide excellent links.
Whether one wants to acknowledge the good works being done is up to the individual.
I agree that having more and more company in this and other progressive/liberal causes is very encouraging.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)"Whether one wants to acknowledge the good works being done is up to the individual."
The only refusal to acknowledge going on is generally by folks like yourself who only ever want to acknowledge the good things done by religion or religious people and dismiss the bad (or insist on attributing the bad to anything BUT religion).
Many people feel that unless we all take an honest, open approach to the pluses AND minuses of religion, real change cannot happen. You have continued to marginalize those people, putting them on a "bad guys" team and trying to score "wins" against them. This is counter-productive, stifles discussion, and fosters incivility such as that exhibited by okasha.
I of course realize that you've put me on your "bad guys" team and you won't acknowledge a thing I say. But others will see it, and figure out what you're doing.
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)I can't wait to read your book!
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)are just SO proud of having finally joined the party...late, as usual...that they never get tired of telling the rest of us that they've arrived. Why do you suppose it took them so loooooooong? Lousy traffic?
And would you like a list of pagan cultures that had no use for equality under the law whatsoever?
edhopper
(33,615 posts)" the truth is that clergy and people in the pews have long been working both under the radar and publicly for LGBT equality."
While the opponents to Gay rights are vocal and relentless. The religious supporters have been silent. What are they afraid of?
If the cause is true and right, why hide from the light? If a clergy-person spoke out every time another condemned gay people, the religious bigots would be shown for what they are.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Under the radar means just that. They don't get the kind of press the religious right gets. They are not as controversial. But they have been working just the same.
No one is hiding and I think they are very glad for getting some attention at this point.
But, then again, when you get slapped down by members of your own team, such has happened in this very thread, one might want to keep working below the radar.
These groups deserve praise and support.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)of bigotry and prejudice that requires these struggles in the first place, is something that actively discourages liberal believers around the country from speaking out and reclaiming their faith?
If so, that is profoundly absurd. This is a discussion board. People are free to voice their opinions and discuss issues (apparently much to your chagrin). You cannot control them or silence them, nor do you have ANY evidence whatsoever that their comments made on an anonymous message board on the Internet are responsible for progressive believers failing to become politically powerful.
Your continued insinuations otherwise are only causing division and discord - ironically bringing about the very thing you claim to oppose.