Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 07:31 PM Jul 2013

Religious Freedom Is About More Than Religion

U.S. foreign policy should promote liberty of belief—and unbelief.

By ROBERT P. GEORGE AND KATRINA LANTOS SWETT
Mr. George is a professor of jurisprudence at Princeton University and a visiting professor at Harvard Law School. Ms. Lantos Swett is president of the Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice. They are, respectively, chairman and vice chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom.

July 25, 2013, 7:16 p.m. ET

A common theory about freedom of religion suggests that such a value is grounded in a modus vivendi, or compromise: People agree to respect each other's freedom in order to avoid religiously motivated strife. But the modus vivendi theory obscures the deep ground of principle on which the right of religious liberty rests and the true reasons for respecting the religious freedom of others.

As a Republican and a Democrat on the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, we are committed, with our colleagues, to advancing religious liberty around the globe. One of our goals is to make clear that such liberty is not simply a matter of sensible social compromise, or just an American ideal or a Western value, but an essential element of human dignity.

We humans reflect on our condition and inquire into the origins of the cosmos and the meaning of our lives. We seek answers to the deepest questions: Where do we come from? What is our destiny? Is there a transcendent source of meaning and value? Is there a "higher law" that obliges us to rise above our personal interests and desires in order to "do unto others as we would have them do unto us"?

Many of us grasp the point of this quest because we experience ourselves as more than merely material beings tied to nature's necessities. Our most immediate and intimate experiences of ourselves are as free and rational creatures—agents capable of choosing, thus helping to shape our world. We sense that we are responsible for our own actions, and we judge that others, by the same token, are responsible for theirs.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324783204578624510558738282.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Religious Freedom Is About More Than Religion (Original Post) rug Jul 2013 OP
Freedom of Religion implies randr Jul 2013 #1
I agree with everything in the article but I'm not sure what the implication is. Jim__ Jul 2013 #2
Hmmm, that conclusion could lead to a cry for wars in the name of religious freedom. rug Jul 2013 #3

Jim__

(14,083 posts)
2. I agree with everything in the article but I'm not sure what the implication is.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 08:48 PM
Jul 2013
Since America's founding, the country has honored this form of liberty. Today, when religious freedom in many parts of the world is under siege, one of the aims of U.S. foreign policy should be to combat such intolerance—not just because religious freedom reduces the risk of sectarian conflict, but more fundamentally because it protects the liberty that is central to human dignity.


Yes, of course religious freedom should be one of the aims of US foreign policy. But that aim has to be weighed against other considerations in any individual case. For instance, we can despise the religious policies of the Saudi regime and should work for change. But, it seems counter-productive to make an enemy of the Saudi regime over such policies. Does this article imply that we should change our relationship with, say, either Saudi Arabia or China? If so, how should the relationship be changed?
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
3. Hmmm, that conclusion could lead to a cry for wars in the name of religious freedom.
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 09:23 PM
Jul 2013

Although that would be as much of a smokescreen as the current wars for freedom, democracy and against terror.

It's unfortunate they framed it as combat.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Religious Freedom Is Abou...