Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 12:48 PM Aug 2013

A Unanimous Decision for Equality

https://www.aclu.org/blog/lgbt-rights-religion-belief/unanimous-decision-equality



08/22/2013

A Unanimous Decision for Equality
By Louise Melling, Director, Center of Liberty; Deputy Legal Director, ACLU at 4:41pm

When a business opens its doors to the public it must comply with anti-discrimination laws, even if doing so offends a business owner's religious beliefs. That's the bottom line in today's unanimous decision by the New Mexico Supreme Court holding that a photography business cannot discriminate against a same-sex couple by refusing, because of the owner's faith, to photograph the couple's commitment ceremony.

In 2006, Vanessa Willock attempted to hire Elane Photography in Albuquerque, NM, to photograph a commitment ceremony that she and her partner were planning. Elaine Huguenin, co-owner of Elane Photography, turned Willock away, refusing to provide services, claiming that doing so would violate her Christian beliefs.

Today's opinion recognizes the sincerity of those beliefs, but makes clear that no one's religious beliefs make it okay to break the law by discriminating against others. In a concurring opinion, Justice Bosson writes:

The Huguenins are free to think, to say, to believe, as they wish; they may pray to the God of their choice and follow those commandments in their personal lives wherever they lead. The Constitution protects the Huguenins in that respect and much more. But there is a price, one that we all have to pay somewhere in our civic life.

In the smaller, more focused world of the marketplace, of commerce, of public accommodation, the Huguenins have to channel their conduct, not their beliefs, so as to leave space for other Americans who believe something different. That compromise is part of the glue that holds us together as a nation, the tolerance that lubricates the varied moving parts of us as a people. The sense of respect we owe others, whether or not we believe as they do, illuminates this country, setting it apart from the discord that afflicts much of the rest of the world.

We couldn't have said it better.

more at link
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Unanimous Decision for Equality (Original Post) cbayer Aug 2013 OP
So sad that the courts have to tell people that their bigotry wrapped in religion is still bigotry. cleanhippie Aug 2013 #1
It shouldn't be that way. LostOne4Ever Aug 2013 #3
What a great judgement! LostOne4Ever Aug 2013 #2

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
1. So sad that the courts have to tell people that their bigotry wrapped in religion is still bigotry.
Fri Aug 23, 2013, 01:53 PM
Aug 2013

To me, this is one of the main reasons that religion is a negative influence; so many think that since religion is a sacred cow, they can use it to condone their hateful views about other humans.
Until religion can no longer be used as a shield from criticism (yes liberal believers, I'm looking at you), we will continue to see bigotry wrapped in a protective cloak of religion.

On a side note, if its illegal to discriminate against your customers based on your personal religious beliefs, why is it (mostly) legal to discriminate against your employees based on your religious beliefs? (Catholic hospitals and other religious businesses not wanting to pay for reproductive healthcare is an example)

LostOne4Ever

(9,289 posts)
3. It shouldn't be that way.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 04:02 AM
Aug 2013

All employers should have to pay. Its the employee's choice, not theirs.

Of course, this would not even be an issue if it was single payer UHC rather than the water downed system we barely passed as is

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»A Unanimous Decision for ...