Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumDon’t tell an atheist she’s not an atheist
http://www.salon.com/2013/10/15/dont_tell_an_atheist_shes_not_an_atheist/singleton/TUESDAY, OCT 15, 2013 03:30 PM PDT
Winfrey disputes Diana Nyad's atheism -- and she's the one who's wrong
BY MARY ELIZABETH WILLIAMS
Diana Nyad, Oprah Winfrey (Credit: Reuters/Andrew Innerarity/AP/Matt Sayles)
Diana Nyad is a woman who knows intimately the power of the human spirit, and the fierce beauty of nature. Diana Nyad is also a woman who says she is an atheist. And Oprah Winfrey disagrees with her.
On a Super Soul Sunday with the 64-year-old long distance swimmer this weekend just one month after Nyads extraordinary, triumphant swim from Cuba to Florida Winfrey took strong issue with Nyads assertion that shes not a God person, but a person deeply in awe. Its true that perhaps appearing in a venue with the word soul in it might seem an unusual choice for a self-described atheist, but Nyad explained. I dont understand why anyone would find a contradiction in that, she said. I can stand at the beachs edge with the most devout Christian, Jew, Buddhist, go on down the line, and weep with the beauty of this universe and be moved by all of humanity all the billions of people who have lived before us, who have loved and hurt and suffered. So to me, my definition of God is humanity and is the love of humanity.
Oprah quickly stepped in with some semantic disagreement. Well, I dont call you an atheist then, she said. I think if you believe in the awe and the wonder and the mystery, that that is what God is. That is what God is. Its not a bearded guy in the sky. But Nyad, who knows a thing or two about being undeterred, pressed on, explaining her skepticism of a creator or overseer. Later, Oprah, still trying to pin Nyad down, asked her if she felt she was spiritual, Nyad replied, I do. I think you can be an atheist who doesnt believe in an overarching Being who created all of this and sees over it. But theres spirituality because we human beings, and we animals and maybe even we plants, but certainly the ocean and the moon and the stars, we all live with something that is cherished and we feel the treasure of it.
Oprahs swift insistence that to experience awe and wonder disqualifies one from atheism was immediately picked up on and criticized as a misunderstanding of nonbelievers. As Hemant Mehta explained on Patheos on the awkward exchange, there neednt be anything religious or spiritual at all about an amazement at how life, the universe, and everything works how evolution made it that way and how lucky we are to be a part of it at all. Religion doesnt have the copyright on awe or gratitude.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 859 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Don’t tell an atheist she’s not an atheist (Original Post)
cbayer
Oct 2013
OP
tanyev
(42,594 posts)1. I think Oprah's got atheists confused with curmudgeons.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)2. Links to previous post on this
by pokerfan http://www.democraticunderground.com/121898140
there were also 2 locked posts in GD
Laochtine
(394 posts)3. Co-opting awe
to make death pleasant, shameful
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)4. There was one strange bit in it.
I think that the soul lives on, because we have created so much energy and when we display courage and hope, it lives on. But I do believe the body goes back to ash and it is never more.
I could interpret that a couple different ways. Information that lives on? Historical record? The memories carried by other people?
Or does she mean a metaphysical soul?
If Nyad meant a metaphysical soul, in anything like the classic sense, then Oprah actually had it right. I would use that term only in the philosophical shorthand of living on in other people's memories, for a time.