Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 08:43 PM Oct 2013

Case before state Supreme Court spurs questions about religion in workplace

By Lornet Turnbull, The Seattle Times
Published: October 22, 2013, 6:00 AM

SEATTLE — Are Washington employers obligated to accommodate their employees' religious practices — giving days off for holidays, for example, or allowing time to pray during work hours?

The Washington Supreme Court will hear arguments today in a case closely watched by legal groups not so much for its merits but for the precedent it could set in finally clarifying the state's discrimination law.

The lawsuit before them was brought by four employees of Gate Gourmet, an international company that prepares food for airline passengers, and which, for security reasons, prohibits its workers from bringing their own meals to work.

The four men — vegetarian, Orthodox Christian, Muslim and Hindu say the meals the company had been serving during the workers' shifts led them unknowingly to eat pork and other foods in conflict with their religious and moral beliefs.

http://www.columbian.com/news/2013/oct/22/case-spurs-questions-about-religion-in-workplace/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Case before state Supreme Court spurs questions about religion in workplace (Original Post) rug Oct 2013 OP
Simple ReRe Oct 2013 #1
It's another effect of the "War on Terror". rug Oct 2013 #2
Alrighty, then.... ReRe Oct 2013 #3
For more reasons than religion get the red out Oct 2013 #4
Since the workers presumably found the employers' food 'safe' to eat xfundy Oct 2013 #5
If there's someone that can't be trusted in the loop... ReRe Oct 2013 #6
As a matter of interest, can anything think what problem the Orthodox Christian might have had? muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #7
Yes it might have been lent. hrmjustin Oct 2013 #8
That's a good question. I'm not aware of any Eastern Orthodox dietary restrictions. rug Oct 2013 #9
IIRC some avoid meat, fish, eggs, and cheese every Wednesday and Friday struggle4progress Oct 2013 #10

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
1. Simple
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 09:01 PM
Oct 2013

Where in the state constitution does it say citizens can't bring their lunch to work? That is the problem, NOT religion.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
2. It's another effect of the "War on Terror".
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 09:03 PM
Oct 2013

Somebody may slip anthrax onto an airline tray from their baloney sandwich.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
3. Alrighty, then....
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 09:13 PM
Oct 2013

... the employer has to provide food that it's employees can eat. Period.

get the red out

(13,466 posts)
4. For more reasons than religion
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 09:22 PM
Oct 2013

People suffer from food allergies, someone could become ill eating something they did not know they were eating.

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
5. Since the workers presumably found the employers' food 'safe' to eat
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 02:00 AM
Oct 2013

one has to wonder whether that same food was part of the product, ie, put into the meals they prepared for airline passengers, which necessarily include vegetarian and kosher, or pig-free, meals.

Is there a bigger story here?

And is the employee breakroom somehow connected to the tray assembly line? If they wanted to smuggle something in, there are plenty of other places to hide poisons, etc., than in one's own lunch bag.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
6. If there's someone that can't be trusted in the loop...
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 03:09 AM
Oct 2013

... it would be the corporation, not the employees. Sound like they have the employees pretty much controlled. If the employer can't furnish and guarantee what's in the food that they are feeding the employees for lunch, and provide the foods that are kosher for the different ethnicities (America is a melting pot, after all), what then? Farm the food preparation out to a third world country? Robots? I think this whole hullabaloo is a bit much ado about nothing. IMHO, this sounds more like a weird case of discrimination on part of the company.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,322 posts)
7. As a matter of interest, can anything think what problem the Orthodox Christian might have had?
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 05:24 PM
Oct 2013

I didn't know they had any different dietary customs from the average western European. Something about Lent, perhaps?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
9. That's a good question. I'm not aware of any Eastern Orthodox dietary restrictions.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 05:43 PM
Oct 2013

If this case is now before the state Supreme Court, the events happened some time ago. Your surmise of Lent is the most likely.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Case before state Supreme...