Religion
Related: About this forumCase before state Supreme Court spurs questions about religion in workplace
By Lornet Turnbull, The Seattle Times
Published: October 22, 2013, 6:00 AM
SEATTLE Are Washington employers obligated to accommodate their employees' religious practices giving days off for holidays, for example, or allowing time to pray during work hours?
The Washington Supreme Court will hear arguments today in a case closely watched by legal groups not so much for its merits but for the precedent it could set in finally clarifying the state's discrimination law.
The lawsuit before them was brought by four employees of Gate Gourmet, an international company that prepares food for airline passengers, and which, for security reasons, prohibits its workers from bringing their own meals to work.
The four men vegetarian, Orthodox Christian, Muslim and Hindu say the meals the company had been serving during the workers' shifts led them unknowingly to eat pork and other foods in conflict with their religious and moral beliefs.
http://www.columbian.com/news/2013/oct/22/case-spurs-questions-about-religion-in-workplace/
Where in the state constitution does it say citizens can't bring their lunch to work? That is the problem, NOT religion.
rug
(82,333 posts)Somebody may slip anthrax onto an airline tray from their baloney sandwich.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... the employer has to provide food that it's employees can eat. Period.
get the red out
(13,466 posts)People suffer from food allergies, someone could become ill eating something they did not know they were eating.
xfundy
(5,105 posts)one has to wonder whether that same food was part of the product, ie, put into the meals they prepared for airline passengers, which necessarily include vegetarian and kosher, or pig-free, meals.
Is there a bigger story here?
And is the employee breakroom somehow connected to the tray assembly line? If they wanted to smuggle something in, there are plenty of other places to hide poisons, etc., than in one's own lunch bag.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... it would be the corporation, not the employees. Sound like they have the employees pretty much controlled. If the employer can't furnish and guarantee what's in the food that they are feeding the employees for lunch, and provide the foods that are kosher for the different ethnicities (America is a melting pot, after all), what then? Farm the food preparation out to a third world country? Robots? I think this whole hullabaloo is a bit much ado about nothing. IMHO, this sounds more like a weird case of discrimination on part of the company.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,322 posts)I didn't know they had any different dietary customs from the average western European. Something about Lent, perhaps?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)If this case is now before the state Supreme Court, the events happened some time ago. Your surmise of Lent is the most likely.