Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 10:32 AM Mar 2013

On Being Catholic

March 30, 2013, 3:07 pm
By GARY GUTTING

An old friend and mentor of mine, Ernan McMullin, was a philosopher of science widely respected in his discipline. He was also a Catholic priest. I don’t know how many times fellow philosophers at professional meetings drew me aside and asked, “Does Ernan really believe that stuff?” (He did.) Amid all the serious and generally respectful coverage of the papal resignation and the election of a new pope, I often detect an undertone of this same puzzlement. Can reflective and honest intellectuals actually believe that stuff?

Here I sketch my reasons for answering “yes.” What I offer is neither apologetics aimed at converting others nor merely personal testimony. Without claiming to speak for others, I try to articulate a position that I expect many fellow Catholics will find congenial and that non-Catholics (even those who reject all religion) may recognize as an intellectually respectable stance. Easter is the traditional time for Christians to reaffirm their faith. I want to show that we can do this without renouncing reason.

Toward the end of James Joyce’s “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man,” the protagonist, Stephen Dedalus, rejects the Roman Catholic faith he was raised in. A friend suggests that he might, then, become a Protestant. Stephen replies, “I said that I had lost the faith . . . but not that I had lost self-respect.” Factoring out the insult to Protestants, I would like to appropriate this Joycean mot to explain my own continuing attachment to the Catholic Church.
.
I read “self-respect” as respect for what are (to borrow the title of the philosopher Charles Taylor’s great book) the “sources of the self.” These are the sources nurturing the values that define an individual’s life. For me, there are two such sources. One is the Enlightenment, where I’m particularly inspired by Voltaire, Hume and the founders of the American republic. The other is the Catholic Church, in which I was baptized as an infant, raised by Catholic parents, and educated for 8 years of elementary school by Ursuline nuns and for 12 more years by Jesuits. For me to deny either of these sources would be to deny something central to my moral being.

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/03/30/on-being-catholic/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On Being Catholic (Original Post) rug Mar 2013 OP
That's an interesting perspective goldent Mar 2013 #1
Yeah, the Irish never forget. rug Mar 2013 #2
Short tempers and long memories -- Brigid Apr 2013 #3

goldent

(1,582 posts)
1. That's an interesting perspective
Sun Mar 31, 2013, 05:59 PM
Mar 2013

and I have not really thought too much of the RCC as a source of my self, but it is without doubt.

I think about my association with the RCC and I realize that all my life I have lived in places with imperfect governments, worked in imperfect organizations, and was a part of an imperfect family. But it never occurred me to leave, because of the imperfection. I guess the RCC suits me

And BTW, that quote “I said that I had lost the faith . . . but not that I had lost self-respect” was SO cold. I've got to work that idea into some sports joke next time some trash-talking is needed

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity»On Being Catholic